These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

589 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29072242)

  • 1. Comparison of the EndoVac system and conventional needle irrigation on removal of the smear layer in primary molar root canals.
    Buldur B; Kapdan A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 29072242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of the EndoVac System and Conventional Needle Irrigation in Primary Molar Root Canals.
    Buldur B; Kapdan A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(4):284-288. PubMed ID: 28650788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Endovac irrigation system with conventional irrigation for removal of intracanal smear layer: an in vitro study.
    Abarajithan M; Dham S; Velmurugan N; Valerian-Albuquerque D; Ballal S; Senthilkumar H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Sep; 112(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 21664151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.
    Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems.
    Thomas AR; Velmurugan N; Smita S; Jothilatha S
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1676-80. PubMed ID: 25052146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Root Canal Dentin Erosion after Different Irrigation Methods Using Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy.
    Wang Z; Maezono H; Shen Y; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1834-1839. PubMed ID: 27769680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of smear layer removal protocols in curved root canals.
    Yeung W; Raldi DP; Cunha RS; Mello I
    Aust Endod J; 2014 Aug; 40(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 25244220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of different irrigation protocols on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a SEM study.
    Demirel A; Yüksel BN; Ziya M; Gümüş H; Doğan S; Sari Ş
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):380-385. PubMed ID: 30859897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris.
    Curtis TO; Sedgley CM
    J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1261-4. PubMed ID: 22892747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.
    Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
    J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of seven different irrigation techniques on debris and the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Yilmaz M; Yılmaz S; Dumanı A; Kuden C; Yoldas O
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Mar; 20(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 28256488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of various irrigation/aspiration protocols on cleaning of flattened root canals.
    Mendonça DH; Colucci V; Rached-Junior FJ; Miranda CE; Silva-Sousa YT; Silva SR
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26154369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals.
    Capar ID; Ozcan E; Arslan H; Ertas H; Aydinbelge HA
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):451-4. PubMed ID: 24565670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of 3 different irrigation systems on removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Alturaiki S; Lamphon H; Edrees H; Ahlquist M
    J Endod; 2015 Jan; 41(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 25442071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.
    Alkahtani A; Al Khudhairi TD; Anil S
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Feb; 14():12. PubMed ID: 24512441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.