These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29073044)

  • 1. SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.
    Hsieh JW; Keller A; Wong M; Jiang RS; Vosshall LB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(43):11275-11284. PubMed ID: 29073044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applicability of the cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in a Japanese population.
    Ogihara H; Kobayashi M; Nishida K; Kitano M; Takeuchi K
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2011; 25(6):404-10. PubMed ID: 22185745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential application of electronic odor diffuser in olfaction testing.
    Ishimaru T; Ishimaru H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2024 Jun; 51(3):507-511. PubMed ID: 38522354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects.
    Hummel T; Kobal G; Gudziol H; Mackay-Sim A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 264(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 17021776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.
    Greenberg MI; Curtis JA; Vearrier D
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2013 Feb; 51(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 23387344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds.
    Kobal G; Klimek L; Wolfensberger M; Gudziol H; Temmel A; Owen CM; Seeber H; Pauli E; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 257(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 10867835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing.
    Gudziol V; Lötsch J; Hähner A; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1858-63. PubMed ID: 17003712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical validation of the olfactory detection threshold module of the Snap & Sniff® olfactory test system.
    Doty RL; Wylie C; Potter M; Beston R; Cope B; Majam K
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2019 Sep; 9(9):986-992. PubMed ID: 31283113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of Taiwan Smell Identification Test: a quick office-based smell screening test for Taiwanese.
    Hsu NI; Lai JT; Shen PH
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2015; 29(2):e50-4. PubMed ID: 25785743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Adaptation for use In Russia of the extended odor identification Sniffin' Sticks test].
    Varvyanskaya AV; Kaspranskaya GR; Kozlov VV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2024; 89(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 39104271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The clinical significance of electrophysiological measures of olfactory function.
    Lötsch J; Hummel T
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 170(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 16563529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test-retest reliability and validity of the Sniffin' TOM odor memory test.
    Croy I; Zehner C; Larsson M; Zucco GM; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2015 Mar; 40(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 25550307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a smell identification test using a novel stick-type odor presentation kit.
    Saito S; Ayabe-Kanamura S; Takashima Y; Gotow N; Naito N; Nozawa T; Mise M; Deguchi Y; Kobayakawa T
    Chem Senses; 2006 May; 31(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 16527871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-ratings of olfactory function reflect odor annoyance rather than olfactory acuity.
    Knaapila A; Tuorila H; Kyvik KO; Wright MJ; Keskitalo K; Hansen J; Kaprio J; Perola M; Silventoinen K
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2212-7. PubMed ID: 18948833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of olfactory training on odor identification in patients with traumatic anosmia.
    Jiang RS; Twu CW; Liang KL
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2019 Nov; 9(11):1244-1251. PubMed ID: 31433573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Subjective assessment of olfactory function].
    Evren C; Yiğit VB; Çınar F
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2015; 25(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25934410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of clinical tests of olfactory function.
    Reden J; Draf C; Frank RA; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 273(4):927-31. PubMed ID: 26050222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of subjective olfaction ratings in patients with and without olfactory disorders.
    Haxel BR; Bertz-Duffy S; Fruth K; Letzel S; Mann WJ; Muttray A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Jul; 126(7):692-7. PubMed ID: 22588245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A threshold-like measure for the assessment of olfactory sensitivity: the "random" procedure.
    Kobal G; Palisch K; Wolf SR; Meyer ED; Hüttenbrink KB; Roscher S; Wagner R; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 May; 258(4):168-72. PubMed ID: 11407447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nature and course of olfactory deficits in Alzheimer's disease.
    Serby M; Larson P; Kalkstein D
    Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Mar; 148(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 1992839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 60.