BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29073044)

  • 1. SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.
    Hsieh JW; Keller A; Wong M; Jiang RS; Vosshall LB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(43):11275-11284. PubMed ID: 29073044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applicability of the cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in a Japanese population.
    Ogihara H; Kobayashi M; Nishida K; Kitano M; Takeuchi K
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2011; 25(6):404-10. PubMed ID: 22185745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential application of electronic odor diffuser in olfaction testing.
    Ishimaru T; Ishimaru H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2024 Jun; 51(3):507-511. PubMed ID: 38522354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects.
    Hummel T; Kobal G; Gudziol H; Mackay-Sim A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 264(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 17021776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.
    Greenberg MI; Curtis JA; Vearrier D
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2013 Feb; 51(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 23387344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds.
    Kobal G; Klimek L; Wolfensberger M; Gudziol H; Temmel A; Owen CM; Seeber H; Pauli E; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 257(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 10867835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing.
    Gudziol V; Lötsch J; Hähner A; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1858-63. PubMed ID: 17003712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical validation of the olfactory detection threshold module of the Snap & Sniff® olfactory test system.
    Doty RL; Wylie C; Potter M; Beston R; Cope B; Majam K
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2019 Sep; 9(9):986-992. PubMed ID: 31283113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of Taiwan Smell Identification Test: a quick office-based smell screening test for Taiwanese.
    Hsu NI; Lai JT; Shen PH
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2015; 29(2):e50-4. PubMed ID: 25785743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The clinical significance of electrophysiological measures of olfactory function.
    Lötsch J; Hummel T
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 170(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 16563529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-retest reliability and validity of the Sniffin' TOM odor memory test.
    Croy I; Zehner C; Larsson M; Zucco GM; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2015 Mar; 40(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 25550307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a smell identification test using a novel stick-type odor presentation kit.
    Saito S; Ayabe-Kanamura S; Takashima Y; Gotow N; Naito N; Nozawa T; Mise M; Deguchi Y; Kobayakawa T
    Chem Senses; 2006 May; 31(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 16527871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-ratings of olfactory function reflect odor annoyance rather than olfactory acuity.
    Knaapila A; Tuorila H; Kyvik KO; Wright MJ; Keskitalo K; Hansen J; Kaprio J; Perola M; Silventoinen K
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2212-7. PubMed ID: 18948833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of olfactory training on odor identification in patients with traumatic anosmia.
    Jiang RS; Twu CW; Liang KL
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2019 Nov; 9(11):1244-1251. PubMed ID: 31433573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Subjective assessment of olfactory function].
    Evren C; Yiğit VB; Çınar F
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2015; 25(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25934410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of clinical tests of olfactory function.
    Reden J; Draf C; Frank RA; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 273(4):927-31. PubMed ID: 26050222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of subjective olfaction ratings in patients with and without olfactory disorders.
    Haxel BR; Bertz-Duffy S; Fruth K; Letzel S; Mann WJ; Muttray A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Jul; 126(7):692-7. PubMed ID: 22588245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A threshold-like measure for the assessment of olfactory sensitivity: the "random" procedure.
    Kobal G; Palisch K; Wolf SR; Meyer ED; Hüttenbrink KB; Roscher S; Wagner R; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 May; 258(4):168-72. PubMed ID: 11407447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The nature and course of olfactory deficits in Alzheimer's disease.
    Serby M; Larson P; Kalkstein D
    Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Mar; 148(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 1992839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Odor stick identification test for Japanese patients with olfactory disturbances].
    Shino M; Furuta A; Uchida J; Ooki S; Suzaki H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2006 Sep; 109(9):689-95. PubMed ID: 17025219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 64.