163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29074847)
1. Recommendation for incorporation of a different lymph node scoring system in future AJCC N category for oral cancer.
Lee CC; Su YC; Hung SK; Chen PC; Huang CI; Huang WL; Lin YW; Yang CC
Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):14117. PubMed ID: 29074847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.
Sun Z; Xu Y; Li de M; Wang ZN; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu HM
Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20336791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Prognostic Ability of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Lee CC; Ho HC; Su YC; Lee MS; Hung SK; Chen YL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Jul; 94(27):e1069. PubMed ID: 26166079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes.
Conci S; Ruzzenente A; Sandri M; Bertuzzo F; Campagnaro T; Bagante F; Capelli P; D'Onofrio M; Piccino M; Dorna AE; Pedrazzani C; Iacono C; Guglielmi A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):743-750. PubMed ID: 28094085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Different lymph node staging systems in patients with gastric cancer from Korean: What is the best prognostic assessment tool?
Lee JW; Ali B; Park CH; Song KY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jun; 95(25):e3860. PubMed ID: 27336871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The relationship between the index of lymph node metastasis and the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients after R0 resection].
Ren H; Wang CF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 42(6):474-479. PubMed ID: 32575943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Incorporation of log odds of positive lymph nodes into the AJCC TNM classification improves prediction of survival in oral cancer.
Lee CC; Lin YS; Kang BH; Chang KP; Chi CC; Lin MY; Su HH; Chang TS; Chen HC; Chen PC; Huang WL; Huang CI; Chou P; Yang CC
Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 42(2):425-432. PubMed ID: 27960043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in predicting overall survival for gastric cancer patients after radical resection].
Luo C; Zhang G; Wang W; Zhou Z; Zhang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 19(10):1107-1112. PubMed ID: 27781245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Stratifies and Predicts Survival of High-Risk Individuals Among Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients.
Lee CW; Wilkinson KH; Sheka AC; Leverson GE; Kennedy GD
Oncologist; 2016 Apr; 21(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 26975865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes.
La Torre M; Nigri G; Petrucciani N; Cavallini M; Aurello P; Cosenza G; Balducci G; Ziparo V; Ramacciato G
Pancreatology; 2014; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 25062879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a superior prognostic indicator in stage III rectal cancer patients: A retrospective analysis of 17,632 patients in the SEER database.
Huang B; Chen C; Ni M; Mo S; Cai G; Cai S
Int J Surg; 2016 Aug; 32():24-30. PubMed ID: 27321382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymph node staging systems in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative analysis.
Subramaniam N; Balasubramanian D; Kumar N; Murthy S; Vijayan SN; Nambiar A; Vidhyadharan S; Thankappan K; Iyer S
Oral Oncol; 2019 Oct; 97():92-98. PubMed ID: 31465931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Log odds of positive lymph nodes may predict survival benefit in patients with node-positive non-small cell lung cancer.
Deng W; Xu T; Wang Y; Xu Y; Yang P; Gomez D; Liao Z
Lung Cancer; 2018 Aug; 122():60-66. PubMed ID: 30032846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of log odds of positive lymph nodes in patients with resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Jin W; Zhu Z; Wu Y; Ding X; Wu H; Song X; Wu Y
Oral Oncol; 2020 Sep; 108():104709. PubMed ID: 32535340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation on prognostic efficacy of lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in complicated colon cancer: the first study in emergency surgery.
Occhionorelli S; Andreotti D; Vallese P; Morganti L; Lacavalla D; Forini E; Pascale G
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 16(1):186. PubMed ID: 30213260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy using the log odds of positive lymph nodes.
Wu SG; Sun JY; Yang LC; Zhou J; Li FY; Li Q; Lin HX; Lin Q; He ZY
Oncotarget; 2015 Nov; 6(34):36911-22. PubMed ID: 26426993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three lymph node staging schemes for predicting the outcome in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma: A population-based cohort and international multicentre cohort study.
Zhou YY; Du XJ; Zhang CH; Aparicio T; Zaanan A; Afchain P; Chen LP; Hu SK; Zhang PC; Wu M; Zhang QW; Wang H
EBioMedicine; 2019 Mar; 41():276-285. PubMed ID: 30824384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prognostic impact of the log odds of positive lymph nodes in colon cancer.
Arslan NC; Sokmen S; Canda AE; Terzi C; Sarioglu S
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Nov; 16(11):O386-92. PubMed ID: 24980876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LODDS is superior to lymph node ratio for the prognosis of node-positive rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy.
Huang B; Ni M; Chen C; Cai G; Cai S
Tumori; 2017 Jan; 103(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 27716883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in colon and rectal cancer patient stratification: a single-center analysis of 323 patients.
Scarinci A; Di Cesare T; Cavaniglia D; Neri T; Colletti M; Cosenza G; Liverani A
Updates Surg; 2018 Mar; 70(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 29500795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
