322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29075967)
1. Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.
Kanekiyo S; Takeda S; Tsutsui M; Nishiyama M; Kitahara M; Shindo Y; Tokumitsu Y; Tomochika S; Tokuhisa Y; Iida M; Sakamoto K; Suzuki N; Yamamoto S; Yoshino S; Hazama S; Ueno T; Nagano H
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1945-1953. PubMed ID: 29075967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone versus Lateral Position: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Miura S; Nakamura T; Miura Y; Takiguchi G; Takase N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(11):3736-3744. PubMed ID: 31313041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is associated with less-restrictive ventilatory impairment and less risk for pulmonary complication than open laparotomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
Oshikiri T; Yasuda T; Kawasaki K; Harada H; Oyama M; Hasegawa H; Ohara T; Sendo H; Nakamura T; Fujino Y; Tominaga M; Kakeji Y
Surgery; 2016 Feb; 159(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 26361833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of operative outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Akiyama Y; Iwaya T; Endo F; Chiba T; Takahara T; Otsuka K; Nitta H; Koeda K; Mizuno M; Kimura Y; Sasaki A
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):391-399. PubMed ID: 28664431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma].
Wang H; Tan LJ; Li JP; Shen YX; Zhang Y; Feng MX; Wang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 15(9):926-9. PubMed ID: 22990925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Propensity-Matched Analysis Comparing Survival After Hybrid Thoracoscopic-Laparotomy Esophagectomy and Complete Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy.
Li KK; Wang YJ; Liu XH; Wang RW; Jiang YG; Guo W
World J Surg; 2019 Mar; 43(3):853-861. PubMed ID: 30386913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcervical inflatable mediastinoscopic esophagectomy versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy for local early- and intermediate-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Chen Z; Huang K; Wei R; Liu C; Fang Y; Wu B; Xu Z; Ding X; Tang H
J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 125(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 35066884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.
Kinjo Y; Kurita N; Nakamura F; Okabe H; Tanaka E; Kataoka Y; Itami A; Sakai Y; Fukuhara S
Surg Endosc; 2012 Feb; 26(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 21898014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between neck-first approach and thoracic approach during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
Kitagawa H; Namikawa T; Iwabu J; Fujisawa K; Kobayashi M; Hanazaki K
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Dec; 402(8):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 29116434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effective Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using Slender Tracheal Forceps in Prone Position Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy.
Nakajima M; Takahashi M; Domeki Y; Satomura H; Muroi H; Kikuchi M; Ogata H; Yamaguchi S; Sasaki K; Sakai M; Sohda M; Miyazaki T; Kuwano H; Kato H
In Vivo; 2016 11-12; 30(6):893-898. PubMed ID: 27815477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis.
Bonavina L; Scolari F; Aiolfi A; Bonitta G; Sironi A; Saino G; Asti E
Surgery; 2016 Apr; 159(4):1073-81. PubMed ID: 26422764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis of semiprone versus prone position.
Seesing MFJ; Goense L; Ruurda JP; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van Hillegersberg R
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2758-2765. PubMed ID: 29209832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
