These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29075992)
1. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return. Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm. Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inhibition of return exaggerates change blindness. Smith DT; Schenk T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 20336583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inhibition of return revisited: Localized inhibition on top of a pervasive bias. Wang B; Yan C; Klein RM; Wang Z Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1861-1867. PubMed ID: 29247423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Returning to "inhibition of return" by dissociating long-term oculomotor IOR from short-term sensory adaptation and other nonoculomotor "inhibitory" cueing effects. Hilchey MD; Klein RM; Satel J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1603-16. PubMed ID: 24820438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets. Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The processes of facilitation and inhibition in a cue-target paradigm: insight from movement trajectory deviations. Neyedli HF; Welsh TN Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 22133725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of different directions of attentional shift on inhibition of return in three-dimensional space. Wang A; Liu X; Chen Q; Zhang M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 26758976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No supplementary evidence of attention to a spatial cue when saccadic facilitation is absent. MacInnes WJ; Bhatnagar R Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13289. PubMed ID: 30185930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the putative role of intervening events in exogenous attention. Martín-Arévalo E; Botta F; De Haro V; Lupiáñez J Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):808-815. PubMed ID: 31720780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inhibitory cueing effects following manual and saccadic responses to arrow cues. Ding Y; He T; Satel J; Wang Z Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1020-9. PubMed ID: 26956560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of onsets and offsets on visual attention. Pratt J; McAuliffe J Psychol Res; 2001; 65(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 11571913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Facilitation and inhibition caused by the orienting of attention in propositional reasoning tasks. Cherubini P; Mazzocco A; Minelli S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1496-523. PubMed ID: 17853220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulus-response incompatibility eliminates inhibitory cueing effects with saccadic but not manual responses. Eng V; Lim A; Kwon S; Gan SR; Jamaluddin SA; Janssen SMJ; Satel J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 28229429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurement-induced attentional control settings. Ivanoff J; Klein RM J Vis; 2003; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12678623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls. Lev-Ari T; Zahar Y; Agarwal A; Gutfreund Y Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):7267. PubMed ID: 32350332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect. Xu B; Tanaka JW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]