These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29076185)

  • 1. Test-compatible confidence intervals for adaptive two-stage single-arm designs with binary endpoint.
    Kunzmann K; Kieser M
    Biom J; 2018 Jan; 60(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 29076185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact confidence limits for the response rate in two-stage designs with over- or under-enrollment in the second stage.
    Shan G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 27389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Point estimation and p-values in phase II adaptive two-stage designs with a binary endpoint.
    Kunzmann K; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):971-984. PubMed ID: 28028823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient confidence limits for adaptive one-arm two-stage clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Shan G; Zhang H; Jiang T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):22. PubMed ID: 28166741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
    Cheng Y; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
    Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
    Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interval and point estimation in adaptive Phase II trials with binary endpoint.
    Nhacolo A; Brannath W
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2635-2648. PubMed ID: 29921157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confidence intervals for the mean of diagnostic test charge data containing zeros.
    Zhou XH; Tu W
    Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1118-25. PubMed ID: 11129469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence intervals for confirmatory adaptive two-stage designs with treatment selection.
    Bebu I; Dragalin V; Luta G
    Biom J; 2013 May; 55(3):294-309. PubMed ID: 23553644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On construction of smallest one-sided confidence intervals for the response rate in adaptive two- or multi-stage designs.
    Wang W; Yin H; Zhang Z
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jun; 29(6):1682-1699. PubMed ID: 32491977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exact confidence limits for the probability of response in two-stage designs.
    Shan G
    Statistics (Ber); 2018; 52(5):1086-1095. PubMed ID: 30906095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On small-sample confidence intervals for parameters in discrete distributions.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2001 Sep; 57(3):963-71. PubMed ID: 11550951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical inference for extended or shortened phase II studies based on Simon's two-stage designs.
    Zhao J; Yu M; Feng XP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jun; 15():48. PubMed ID: 26048655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interim analysis incorporating short- and long-term binary endpoints.
    Niewczas J; Kunz CU; König F
    Biom J; 2019 May; 61(3):665-687. PubMed ID: 30694566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
    Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous confidence sets for several effective doses.
    Tompsett DM; Biedermann S; Liu W
    Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):703-720. PubMed ID: 29611627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.