These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29077584)

  • 21. Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses.
    Walker J; Young G; Hunt C; Henderson T
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 17395523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring Daily Disposable Contact Lenses against Nonwearer Benchmarks.
    Lazon de la Jara P; Diec J; Naduvilath T; Papas EB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1088-1095. PubMed ID: 30451803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of tear osmolarity and ocular comfort between daily disposable contact lenses: hilafilcon B hydrogel versus narafilcon A silicone hydrogel.
    Sarac O; Gurdal C; Bostancı-Ceran B; Can I
    Int Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 32(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 22484700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Omafilcon A (Proclear) soft contact lenses in a dry eye population.
    Lemp MA; Caffery B; Lebow K; Lembach R; Park J; Foulks G; Hall B; Bowers R; McGarvey S; Young G
    CLAO J; 1999 Jan; 25(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 10073636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Soft Contact Lens-Related Symptoms in North America and the United Kingdom.
    Chalmers RL; Young G; Kern J; Napier L; Hunt C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):836-47. PubMed ID: 27391535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A 3-year prospective study of the clinical performance of daily disposable contact lenses compared with frequent replacement and conventional daily wear contact lenses.
    Solomon OD; Freeman MI; Boshnick EL; Cannon WM; Dubow BW; Kame RT; Lanier JC; Lopanik RW; Quinn TG; Rigel LE; Sherrill DD; Stiegmeier MJ; Teiche RS; Zigler LG; Mertz GW; Nason RJ
    CLAO J; 1996 Oct; 22(4):250-7. PubMed ID: 8906382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of surface water characteristics of novel daily disposable contact lens materials, using refractive index shifts after wear.
    Schafer J; Steffen R; Reindel W; Chinn J
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1973-9. PubMed ID: 26543349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prospective study of lotrafilcon B lenses comparing 2 versus 4 weeks of wear for objective and subjective measures of health, comfort, and vision.
    Eiden SB; Davis RL; Bergenske PD
    Eye Contact Lens; 2013 Jul; 39(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 23771011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of internal lubricating agents of disposable soft contact lenses on higher-order aberrations after blinking.
    Koh S; Maeda N; Hamano T; Hirohara Y; Mihashi T; Hori Y; Hosohata J; Fujikado T; Tano Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Mar; 34(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18327045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers.
    Dillehay SM; Miller MB
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):272-7. PubMed ID: 17993820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of ocular comfort, vision, and SICS during silicone hydrogel contact lens daily wear.
    Diec J; Evans VE; Tilia D; Naduvilath T; Holden BA; Lazon de la Jara P
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Jan; 38(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 22169881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance evaluation of delefilcon a water gradient daily disposable contact lenses in first-time contact lens wearers.
    Marx S; Lauenborg B; Kern JR
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Aug; 41(4):335-341. PubMed ID: 29426803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comfort After Refitting Symptomatic Habitual Reusable Toric Lens Wearers with a New Daily Disposable Contact Lens for Astigmatism.
    Wan K; Mashouf J; Hall B
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():3235-3241. PubMed ID: 37927572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses.
    Pritchard N; Fonn D; Weed K
    CLAO J; 1996 Jan; 22(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8835070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vivo dehydration of disposable (Acuvue) contact lenses.
    Brennan NA; Lowe R; Efron N; Harris MG
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 67(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 2320364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of comfort and tear stability with two novel silicone-hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses.
    Mimura T; Noma H; Yamaguchi M; Shinbo K
    Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; 44(1):136. PubMed ID: 38485796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Symptoms and Signs in Rigid Gas Permeable Lens Wearers During Adaptation Period.
    Carracedo G; Martin-Gil A; Peixoto-de-Matos SC; Abejón-Gil P; Macedo-de-Araújo R; González-Méijome JM
    Eye Contact Lens; 2016 Mar; 42(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 25943051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Understanding Ocular Discomfort and Dryness Using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire.
    Li W; Graham AD; Lin MC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154753. PubMed ID: 27137908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Subjective Ratings and Satisfaction in Contact Lens Wear.
    Diec J; Naduvilath T; Tilia D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 95(3):256-263. PubMed ID: 29424828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of Masking on Subjective Responses to Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
    Keir N; Luensmann D; Woods CA; Bergenske P; Fahmy M; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):828-35. PubMed ID: 27232895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.