These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29078942)

  • 1. Elective Induction of Labor: What is the Impact?
    Little SE
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2017 Dec; 44(4):601-614. PubMed ID: 29078942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].
    Rozenberg P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk.
    Sinkey RG; Lacevic J; Reljic T; Hozo I; Gibson KS; Odibo AO; Djulbegovic B; Lockwood CJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0193169. PubMed ID: 29694344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 211(3):249.e1-249.e16. PubMed ID: 24631440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
    Wolfe H; Timofeev J; Tefera E; Desale S; Driggers RW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group.
    Hannah ME; Ohlsson A; Farine D; Hewson SA; Hodnett ED; Myhr TL; Wang EE; Weston JA; Willan AR
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Apr; 334(16):1005-10. PubMed ID: 8598837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
    Rozenberg P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induction of Labor and Cesarean: What is the True Relationship?
    Little SE; Caughey AB
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 58(2):269-81. PubMed ID: 25851850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconsideration of the costs of convenience: quality, operational, and fiscal strategies to minimize elective labor induction.
    Simpson KR
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 24(1):43-52; quiz 53-4. PubMed ID: 20147829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing expectant management and spontaneous labor approaches in studying the effect of labor induction on cesarean delivery.
    Danilack VA; Triche EW; Dore DD; Muri JH; Phipps MG; Savitz DA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):405-411.e1. PubMed ID: 27211604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elective induction of labor and the risk of cesarean section in low-risk parous women: a cohort study.
    Jonsson M; Cnattingius S; Wikström AK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 23157554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
    Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Delivery at Term: When, How, and Why.
    Walker KF; Thornton JG
    Clin Perinatol; 2018 Jun; 45(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 29747883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Labor Induction Techniques: Which Is the Best?
    Penfield CA; Wing DA
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2017 Dec; 44(4):567-582. PubMed ID: 29078939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.
    Combs CA; Singh NB; Khoury JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 81(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 8459954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Vayssière C; Haumonte JB; Chantry A; Coatleven F; Debord MP; Gomez C; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Salomon LJ; Senat MV; Sentilhes L; Serry A; Winer N; Grandjean H; Verspyck E; Subtil D;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 23434325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.