149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29079369)
1. Comparison of contact radiographed and stained histological sections for osseointegration analysis of dental implants: an in vivo study.
Bissinger O; Götz C; Jeschke A; Haller B; Wolff KD; Kaiser P; Kolk A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Jan; 125(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 29079369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative 3D micro-CT and 2D histomorphometry analysis of dental implant osseointegration in the maxilla of minipigs.
Bissinger O; Probst FA; Wolff KD; Jeschke A; Weitz J; Deppe H; Kolk A
J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Apr; 44(4):418-427. PubMed ID: 28063250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae.
Gahlert M; Roehling S; Sprecher CM; Kniha H; Milz S; Bormann K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 21806681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the influence of the macro- and microstructure of dental zirconium implants on osseointegration: a minipig study.
Mueller CK; Solcher P; Peisker A; Mtsariashvilli M; Schlegel KA; Hildebrand G; Rost J; Liefeith K; Chen J; Schultze-Mosgau S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jul; 116(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 22762921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of minipigs. Part II: histomorphometric analysis.
Nkenke E; Fenner M; Vairaktaris EG; Neukam FW; Radespiel-Tröger M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 16161738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs.
Herrero-Climent M; Romero Ruizª MM; Calvo PL; Santos JVR; Perez RA; Gil Mur FJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1423-1432. PubMed ID: 29022215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three-dimensional digital analyses and two-dimensional histomorphometric analyses of the bone-implant interface.
Hong JM; Kim UG; Yeo IL
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276269. PubMed ID: 36240217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Titanium implant functionalization with phosphate-containing polymers may favour in vivo osseointegration.
Cardoso MV; de Rycker J; Chaudhari A; Coutinho E; Yoshida Y; Van Meerbeek B; Mesquita MF; da Silva WJ; Yoshihara K; Vandamme K; Duyck J
J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Sep; 44(9):950-960. PubMed ID: 28453878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of imaging methods used for dental implant osseous integration assessment.
Sprecher CM; Gahlert M; Röhling S; Kniha H; Gueorguiev B; Milz S
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2013 Sep; 24(9):2195-200. PubMed ID: 23838879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of bone-implant contact and bone-implant volume between 2D-histological sections and 3D-SRµCT slices.
Bernhardt R; Kuhlisch E; Schulz MC; Eckelt U; Stadlinger B
Eur Cell Mater; 2012 Apr; 23():237-47; discussion 247-8. PubMed ID: 22492016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla.
Trisi P; Lazzara R; Rebaudi A; Rao W; Testori T; Porter SS
J Periodontol; 2003 Jul; 74(7):945-56. PubMed ID: 12931756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biocompatibility and osseointegration of nanostructured titanium dental implants in minipigs.
Hoornaert A; Vidal L; Besnier R; Morlock JF; Louarn G; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jun; 31(6):526-535. PubMed ID: 32058629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of ultraviolet photofunctionalization of dental titanium implants on osseointegration.
Mehl C; Kern M; Neumann F; Bähr T; Wiltfang J; Gassling V
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2018 Jul; 19(7):525-534. PubMed ID: 29971991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration of titanium implants with SLAffinity treatment: a histological and biomechanical study in miniature pigs.
Ou KL; Hsu HJ; Yang TS; Lin YH; Chen CS; Peng PW
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1515-24. PubMed ID: 26507647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of zirconia and titanium implants after a short healing period. A pilot study in minipigs.
Stadlinger B; Hennig M; Eckelt U; Kuhlisch E; Mai R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 20172693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Osseointegration of short titan implants: A pilot study in pigs.
Botzenhart U; Kunert-Keil C; Heinemann F; Gredes T; Seiler J; Berniczei-Roykó Á; Gedrange T
Ann Anat; 2015 May; 199():16-22. PubMed ID: 24780612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegration of a novel injection molded 2-piece ceramic dental implant: a study in minipigs.
Thomé G; Sandgren R; Bernardes S; Trojan L; Warfving N; Bellón B; Pippenger BE
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Feb; 25(2):603-615. PubMed ID: 32914271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early bone apposition to hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium implant surfaces: a histologic and histomorphometric study in minipigs.
Vasak C; Busenlechner D; Schwarze UY; Leitner HF; Munoz Guzon F; Hefti T; Schlottig F; Gruber R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1378-85. PubMed ID: 24118429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osseointegration of Zirconia in the Presence of Multinucleated Giant Cells.
Chappuis V; Cavusoglu Y; Gruber R; Kuchler U; Buser D; Bosshardt DD
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):686-98. PubMed ID: 26377587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
