404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29079899)
1. Epigenetic regulation of the expression of WRKY75 transcription factor in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in Solanaceae plants.
López-Galiano MJ; González-Hernández AI; Crespo-Salvador O; Rausell C; Real MD; Escamilla M; Camañes G; García-Agustín P; González-Bosch C; García-Robles I
Plant Cell Rep; 2018 Jan; 37(1):167-176. PubMed ID: 29079899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Histone Marks Signature in Exonic and Intronic Regions Is Relevant in Early Response of Tomato Genes to
Crespo-Salvador Ó; Sánchez-Giménez L; López-Galiano MJ; Fernández-Crespo E; Schalschi L; García-Robles I; Rausell C; Real MD; González-Bosch C
Plants (Basel); 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32121544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of Stress Associated microRNAs in
López-Galiano MJ; Sentandreu V; Martínez-Ramírez AC; Rausell C; Real MD; Camañes G; Ruiz-Rivero O; Crespo-Salvador O; García-Robles I
Genes (Basel); 2019 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 31234458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of histone epigenetic marks in Arabidopsis and tomato genes in the early response to Botrytis cinerea.
Crespo-Salvador Ó; Escamilla-Aguilar M; López-Cruz J; López-Rodas G; González-Bosch C
Plant Cell Rep; 2018 Jan; 37(1):153-166. PubMed ID: 29119291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tomato NAC transcription factor SlSRN1 positively regulates defense response against biotic stress but negatively regulates abiotic stress response.
Liu B; Ouyang Z; Zhang Y; Li X; Hong Y; Huang L; Liu S; Zhang H; Li D; Song F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102067. PubMed ID: 25010573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tomato SR/CAMTA transcription factors SlSR1 and SlSR3L negatively regulate disease resistance response and SlSR1L positively modulates drought stress tolerance.
Li X; Huang L; Zhang Y; Ouyang Z; Hong Y; Zhang H; Li D; Song F
BMC Plant Biol; 2014 Oct; 14():286. PubMed ID: 25348703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A tomato ERF transcription factor, SlERF84, confers enhanced tolerance to drought and salt stress but negatively regulates immunity against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000.
Li Z; Tian Y; Xu J; Fu X; Gao J; Wang B; Han H; Wang L; Peng R; Yao Q
Plant Physiol Biochem; 2018 Nov; 132():683-695. PubMed ID: 30146417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular mechanism of modulating miR482b level in tomato with botrytis cinerea infection.
Wu F; Xu J; Gao T; Huang D; Jin W
BMC Plant Biol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):496. PubMed ID: 34706648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tomato histone H2B monoubiquitination enzymes SlHUB1 and SlHUB2 contribute to disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea through modulating the balance between SA- and JA/ET-mediated signaling pathways.
Zhang Y; Li D; Zhang H; Hong Y; Huang L; Liu S; Li X; Ouyang Z; Song F
BMC Plant Biol; 2015 Oct; 15():252. PubMed ID: 26490733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tomato WRKY transcriptional factor SlDRW1 is required for disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea and tolerance to oxidative stress.
Liu B; Hong YB; Zhang YF; Li XH; Huang L; Zhang HJ; Li DY; Song FM
Plant Sci; 2014 Oct; 227():145-56. PubMed ID: 25219316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comprehensive analysis of multiprotein bridging factor 1 family genes and SlMBF1c negatively regulate the resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato.
Zhang X; Xu Z; Chen L; Ren Z
BMC Plant Biol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):437. PubMed ID: 31638895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional analysis of endo-1,4-β-glucanases in response to Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae reveals their involvement in plant-pathogen interactions.
Finiti I; Leyva MO; López-Cruz J; Calderan Rodrigues B; Vicedo B; Angulo C; Bennett AB; Grant M; García-Agustín P; González-Bosch C
Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2013 Sep; 15(5):819-31. PubMed ID: 23528138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The wheat multidomain cystatin TaMDC1 displays antifungal, antibacterial, and insecticidal activities in planta.
Christova PK; Christov NK; Mladenov PV; Imai R
Plant Cell Rep; 2018 Jun; 37(6):923-932. PubMed ID: 29532251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The silencing of DEK reduced disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 based on virus-induced gene silencing analysis in tomato.
Zhang H; Yan M; Deng R; Song F; Jiang M
Gene; 2020 Feb; 727():144245. PubMed ID: 31715302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. miR319c acts as a positive regulator of tomato against Botrytis cinerea infection by targeting TCP29.
Wu F; Qi J; Meng X; Jin W
Plant Sci; 2020 Nov; 300():110610. PubMed ID: 33180702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tomato Sl3-MMP, a member of the Matrix metalloproteinase family, is required for disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000.
Li D; Zhang H; Song Q; Wang L; Liu S; Hong Y; Huang L; Song F
BMC Plant Biol; 2015 Jun; 15():143. PubMed ID: 26070456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antagonism between phytohormone signalling underlies the variation in disease susceptibility of tomato plants under elevated CO2.
Zhang S; Li X; Sun Z; Shao S; Hu L; Ye M; Zhou Y; Xia X; Yu J; Shi K
J Exp Bot; 2015 Apr; 66(7):1951-63. PubMed ID: 25657213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The abiotic stress-responsive NAC-type transcription factor SlNAC4 regulates salt and drought tolerance and stress-related genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum).
Zhu M; Chen G; Zhang J; Zhang Y; Xie Q; Zhao Z; Pan Y; Hu Z
Plant Cell Rep; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1851-63. PubMed ID: 25063324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of dioxygenase α-DOX2 and SA in basal response and in hexanoic acid-induced resistance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants against Botrytis cinerea.
Angulo C; de la O Leyva M; Finiti I; López-Cruz J; Fernández-Crespo E; García-Agustín P; González-Bosch C
J Plant Physiol; 2015 Mar; 175():163-73. PubMed ID: 25543862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overexpression of SlMYB75 enhances resistance to Botrytis cinerea and prolongs fruit storage life in tomato.
Liu M; Zhang Z; Xu Z; Wang L; Chen C; Ren Z
Plant Cell Rep; 2021 Jan; 40(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 32990799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
