75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29080311)
1. The framing of research questions using the PICOT format in randomized controlled trials of venous ulcer disease is suboptimal: A systematic survey.
Abbade LPF; Wang M; Sriganesh K; Jin Y; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep; 25(5):892-900. PubMed ID: 29080311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Framing of research question using the PICOT format in randomised controlled trials of venous ulcer disease: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature.
Abbade LP; Wang M; Sriganesh K; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e013175. PubMed ID: 27836875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials.
Rios LP; Ye C; Thabane L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Feb; 10():11. PubMed ID: 20137069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A look at the potential association between PICOT framing of a research question and the quality of reporting of analgesia RCTs.
Borg Debono V; Zhang S; Ye C; Paul J; Arya A; Hurlburt L; Murthy Y; Thabane L
BMC Anesthesiol; 2013 Nov; 13(1):44. PubMed ID: 24252549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posing the research question: not so simple.
Thabane L; Thomas T; Ye C; Paul J
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jan; 56(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19247780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heterogeneity of wound outcome measures in RCTs of treatments for VLUs: a systematic review.
Gethin G; Killeen F; Devane D
J Wound Care; 2015 May; 24(5):211-2, 214, 216 passim. PubMed ID: 25970758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence for varicose vein surgery in venous leg ulceration.
Kheirelseid EA; Bashar K; Aherne T; Babiker T; Naughton P; Moneley D; Walsh SR; Leahy AL
Surgeon; 2016 Aug; 14(4):219-33. PubMed ID: 27095286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the uncertainty of treatment outcomes in a previous systematic review of venous leg ulcer randomized controlled trials: Additional secondary analysis.
Eckert KA; Carter MJ
Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Mar; 29(2):327-334. PubMed ID: 33556200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External validity of randomized controlled trials of interventions in venous leg ulceration: A systematic review.
Gethin G; Ivory JD; Connell L; McIntosh C; Weller CD
Wound Repair Regen; 2019 Nov; 27(6):702-710. PubMed ID: 31376298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of optimal anticoagulation therapy on chronic venous ulcer healing in thrombophilic patients with post-thrombotic syndrome.
Hinojosa CA; Olivares-Cruz S; Laparra-Escareno H; Sanchez-Castro S; Tamayo-Garcia B; Anaya-Ayala JE
J Wound Care; 2016 Dec; 25(12):756-759. PubMed ID: 27974007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
Rongen JJ; Hannink G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating the applicability of wound care randomized controlled trials to general wound-care populations by estimating the percentage of individuals excluded from a typical wound-care population in such trials.
Carter MJ; Fife CE; Walker D; Thomson B
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Jul; 22(7):316-24. PubMed ID: 20375969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Innovative wound care--new studies to increase evidence].
Kroger K; Storck M; Risse A
MMW Fortschr Med; 2013 Jul; 155 Suppl 2():51-5. PubMed ID: 24930322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?
Mansouri A; Cooper B; Shin SM; Kondziolka D
J Neurosurg; 2016 Feb; 124(2):558-68. PubMed ID: 26315006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Emulation of Randomized Clinical Trials With Nonrandomized Database Analyses: Results of 32 Clinical Trials.
Wang SV; Schneeweiss S; ; Franklin JM; Desai RJ; Feldman W; Garry EM; Glynn RJ; Lin KJ; Paik J; Patorno E; Suissa S; D'Andrea E; Jawaid D; Lee H; Pawar A; Sreedhara SK; Tesfaye H; Bessette LG; Zabotka L; Lee SB; Gautam N; York C; Zakoul H; Concato J; Martin D; Paraoan D; Quinto K
JAMA; 2023 Apr; 329(16):1376-1385. PubMed ID: 37097356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey.
Miranda JS; Abbade LPF; Deonizio AP; Abbade JF; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L
BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e024633. PubMed ID: 30772853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolving the PICOT Method for the Digital Age: The PICOT-D.
Elias BL; Polancich S; Jones C; Convoy S
J Nurs Educ; 2015 Oct; 54(10):594-9. PubMed ID: 26431521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of venous ulcers on patients' quality of life: an integrative review.
Joaquim FL; Silva RMCRA; Garcia-Caro MP; Cruz-Quintana F; Pereira ER
Rev Bras Enferm; 2018; 71(4):2021-2029. PubMed ID: 30156692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
