These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29081545)

  • 1. Unified snr analysis of medical imaging systems.
    Wagner RF; Brown DG
    Phys Med Biol; 1985 Jun; 30(6):489-518. PubMed ID: 29081545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More Unified Analysis of Medical Imaging System SNR Characteristics.
    Wagner RF; Brown DG
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 1984 Jun; 454():1-8. PubMed ID: 29346454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging: I. A practical approach based on statistical decision theory.
    Tapiovaara MJ; Wagner RF
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Jan; 38(1):71-92. PubMed ID: 8426870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 4D numerical observer for lesion detection in respiratory-gated PET.
    Lorsakul A; Li Q; Trott CM; Hoog C; Petibon Y; Ouyang J; Laine AF; El Fakhri G
    Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):102504. PubMed ID: 25281979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluation of contrast-detail in full field digital mammography systems using ideal (Hotelling) observer vs. conventional automated analysis of CDMAM images for quality control of contrast-detail characteristics.
    Delakis I; Wise R; Morris L; Kulama E
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):741-6. PubMed ID: 25735660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
    Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Reconstruction Algorithms to Validate the NEMA Phantom Results in Clinical Scenario - A Comparative Study Using Time-of-Flight versus Non-Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography Imaging.
    Kumar A; Jacob P; Watts A; Joseph A; Kaur H; Hooda M; Kaur A; Singh B
    Indian J Nucl Med; 2022; 37(2):113-120. PubMed ID: 35982821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Instrumentation for Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography.
    Ullah MN; Pratiwi E; Cheon J; Choi H; Yeom JY
    Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Jun; 50(2):112-22. PubMed ID: 27275359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms.
    Gagne RM; Gallas BD; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 16485413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intensity threshold based solid tumour segmentation method for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images: A review.
    Tamal M
    Heliyon; 2020 Oct; 6(10):e05267. PubMed ID: 33163642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of PET and SPECT phantom image quality through automated binary classification of cold rod arrays.
    DiFilippo FP
    Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3451-3461. PubMed ID: 31115055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relating
    Leung EK; Abdelhafez YG; Berg E; Xie Z; Zhang X; Bayerlein R; Spencer B; Li E; Omidvari N; Selfridge A; Cherry SR; Qi J; Badawi RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jun; 67(12):. PubMed ID: 35609588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance.
    Gang GJ; Lee J; Stayman JW; Tward DJ; Zbijewski W; Prince JL; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1754-68. PubMed ID: 21626910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compressed sensing for reduction of noise and artefacts in direct PET image reconstruction.
    Richter D; Basse-Lüsebrink TC; Kampf T; Fischer A; Israel I; Schneider M; Jakob PM; Samnick S
    Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 23756331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
    Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging.
    Chang T; Chang G; Clark JW; Diab RH; Rohren E; Mawlawi OR
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5891-900. PubMed ID: 23039628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
    Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
    Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theoretical study of lesion detectability of MAP reconstruction using computer observers.
    Qi J; Huesman RH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):815-22. PubMed ID: 11513032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A minimum SNR criterion for computed tomography object detection in the projection domain.
    Hsieh SS; Leng S; Yu L; Huber NR; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):4988-4998. PubMed ID: 35754205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.