These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29082538)
41. Analyzing spatially distributed binary data using independent-block estimating equations. Oman SD; Landsman V; Carmel Y; Kadmon R Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):892-900. PubMed ID: 17489971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Weighted pairwise likelihood estimation for a general class of random effects models. Vasdekis VG; Rizopoulos D; Moustaki I Biostatistics; 2014 Oct; 15(4):677-89. PubMed ID: 24812421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Birnbaum-Saunders frailty regression models: Diagnostics and application to medical data. Leão J; Leiva V; Saulo H; Tomazella V Biom J; 2017 Mar; 59(2):291-314. PubMed ID: 28054373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Diagnostic plots to reveal functional form for covariates in multiplicative intensity models. Grambsch PM; Therneau TM; Fleming TR Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1469-82. PubMed ID: 8589234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Random effects modeling approaches for estimating ROC curves from repeated ordinal tests without a gold standard. Albert PS Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):593-602. PubMed ID: 17688512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models. Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The sum of standardized residuals: Goodness-of-fit test for binary response models. Chen L; Sui Y; Song C; Rempala GA Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1932-1941. PubMed ID: 29579778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of diagnostic scores with adjustment for covariates. Berres M; Zehnder A; Bläsi S; Monsch AU Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1777-90. PubMed ID: 17968872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Goodness of fit tests for random effect models with binary responses. Korre AK; Vasdekis VGS Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4571-4587. PubMed ID: 30125377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. GEE estimation of a misspecified time-varying covariate: an example with the effect of alcoholism treatment on medical utilization. Wall MM; Dai Y; Eberly LE Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):925-39. PubMed ID: 15558618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. GEE for multinomial responses using a local odds ratios parameterization. Touloumis A; Agresti A; Kateri M Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 23724948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A likelihood-based two-part marginal model for longitudinal semicontinuous data. Su L; Tom BD; Farewell VT Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Apr; 24(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 21873302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Misspecified poisson regression models for large-scale registry data: inference for 'large n and small p'. Grøn R; Gerds TA; Andersen PK Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(7):1117-29. PubMed ID: 26423319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Point and interval estimation of accuracies of a binary medical diagnostic test following group sequential testing. Shu Y; Liu A; Li Z Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Jul; 366(1874):2335-45. PubMed ID: 18407894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Marginalized transition shared random effects models for longitudinal binary data with nonignorable dropout. Lee M; Lee K; Lee J Biom J; 2014 Mar; 56(2):230-42. PubMed ID: 24430985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The weighted generalized estimating equations approach for the evaluation of medical diagnostic test at subunit level. Lin CY; Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(5):758-71. PubMed ID: 17094341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Data-driven smooth tests of the proportional hazards assumption. Kraus D Lifetime Data Anal; 2007 Mar; 13(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17115257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Estimation methods for marginal and association parameters for longitudinal binary data with nonignorable missing observations. Li H; Yi GY Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(5):833-48. PubMed ID: 22833460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Identifiability of models for multiple diagnostic testing in the absence of a gold standard. Jones G; Johnson WO; Hanson TE; Christensen R Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):855-63. PubMed ID: 19764953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]