These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29082804)

  • 1. Euclidean Mate Value and Power of Choice on the Mating Market.
    Conroy-Beam D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Feb; 44(2):252-264. PubMed ID: 29082804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Duyar DA; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Kennair LEO; Kervyn N; Thi Khanh Ha T; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Thi Linh T; Lopez G; Van Luot N; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Varella MAC; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zaťková M; Zupančič M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16885. PubMed ID: 31729413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How Are Mate Preferences Linked with Actual Mate Selection? Tests of Mate Preference Integration Algorithms Using Computer Simulations and Actual Mating Couples.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156078. PubMed ID: 27276030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jul; 111(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 27337140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships.
    Gerlach TM; Arslan RC; Schultze T; Reinhard SK; Penke L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):313-330. PubMed ID: 28921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.
    Buss DM; Schmitt DP
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():77-110. PubMed ID: 30230999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics.
    Castro FN; Hattori WT; de Araújo Lopes F
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1729-36. PubMed ID: 25896490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mate Preferences for Warmth-Trustworthiness Predict Romantic Attraction in the Early Stages of Mate Selection and Satisfaction in Ongoing Relationships.
    Valentine KA; Li NP; Meltzer AL; Tsai MH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Feb; 46(2):298-311. PubMed ID: 31184259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: further investigations using the Mate Preferences Towards Altruistic Traits Scale.
    Farrelly D
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 23951948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Evolutionary Perspective on Mate Rejection.
    Kelly AJ; Dubbs SL; Barlow FK
    Evol Psychol; 2016; 14(4):1474704916678626. PubMed ID: 28024416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships.
    Mehmetoglu M; Määttänen I
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920979623. PubMed ID: 33371743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-Rated Attractiveness Moderates the Relationship Between Dark Personality Traits and Romantic Ideals in Women.
    Birkás B; Láng A; Meskó N
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Feb; 121(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 29298572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolutionary psychology of human mating: a response to Buller's critique.
    Klasios J
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Sep; 47 Pt A():1-11. PubMed ID: 24927270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
    Goetz CD
    Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings?
    Stulp G; Buunk AP; Pollet TV; Nettle D; Verhulst S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54186. PubMed ID: 23342102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self, friends, and lovers: structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values.
    Kirsner BR; Figueredo AJ; Jacobs WJ
    J Affect Disord; 2003 Jul; 75(2):131-48. PubMed ID: 12798253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in human mate preferences vary across sex ratios.
    Walter KV; Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Duyar DA; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Ottesen Kennair LE; Kervyn N; Khanh Ha TT; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Linh TT; Lopez G; Luot NV; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Correa Varella MA; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zaťková MM; Zupančič M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jul; 288(1955):20211115. PubMed ID: 34284630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.