These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 290836)

  • 1. Histologic studies of endosseous blade-vent implants of a human mandible: report of an autopsy case.
    Schneider P; Makek M; Feigel A; Ochsenbein H; Lutz F; Mühlemann HR
    J Oral Implantol; 1978; 8(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 290836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Histological study of an endosseous blade implant in the human mandible. A case report].
    Schneider PE
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Nov; 89(11):1139-40. PubMed ID: 293908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomical considerations when using endodontic endosseous pins and blade implants.
    Barker BC
    Implantologist; 1978 Aug; 1(3):87-101. PubMed ID: 290560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Linkow implants (blade-vent)].
    Torres MD; Yelos E
    Rev Ateneo Argent Odontol; 1987; 22(2):41-4, 46-9. PubMed ID: 3271563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An experimental study on the tissue compatibility of the titanium blade-vent implant coated with HAP-alumina in the semi-functional state.
    Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Suetsugu T; Tanaka J; Tsunosue U
    J Oral Implantol; 1987; 13(3):387-401. PubMed ID: 2855647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The titanalloy endosseous implant.
    Hahn J
    Implantologist; 1981; 2(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 6955273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endosteal blade-vent implants.
    Babbush CA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jul; 24(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 6995176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences between the bony interfaces of titanium and hydroxyapatite-alumina plasma-sprayed titanium blade implants.
    Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Akedo H; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1988; 14(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 2855931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Deformation studies of an embalmed human mandible in the wet state and an implant blade under static loading].
    Shimada J; Koh T; Yamamoto Y; Sumida H; Hasuike T; Niikura K; Yagiu Y
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1981; 10(3):413-21. PubMed ID: 6959671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Various properties of metal dental blade implants].
    Vanĕk J; Cecara J; Freybarg L; Zeman J; Nĕmec A; Smĕkal M
    Prakt Zubn Lek; 1984 Jun; 32(5):133-5. PubMed ID: 6592555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. I. Histological aspects.
    Brunski JB; Moccia AF; Pollack SR; Korostoff E; Trachtenberg DI
    J Dent Res; 1979 Oct; 58(10):1953-69. PubMed ID: 291620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. II. Clinical aspects.
    Brunski JB; Moccia AF; Pollack SR; Korostoff E; Trachtenberg DI
    J Dent Res; 1979 Oct; 58(10):1970-80. PubMed ID: 291621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Overview of new studies of fibro-osseous integrated blade implants and osseointegrated screw implants (I)].
    Weiss CM
    Quintessenz; 1988 Jul; 39(7):1157-66. PubMed ID: 3252328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical analysis of Linkow blade vent implants.
    Dahl GS
    J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 6368847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative investigation in dogs: 2-year morphometric results of the dental implant--bone interface.
    Steflik DE; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Davis HC; Adams BO; Yavari J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 8820118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative study on the interface between bone tissue and Blade-vent implants using the image processing system.
    Takeshita F; Akedo H; Kihara A; Morimoto K; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1989; 15(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 2640247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An eight-year report and the rationale for the buttressed anchor--an innovation in blade design.
    James RA; Valantine KR
    J Oral Implantol; 1978; 8(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 385900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Considerations for three dimensional implants.
    Mahler MS
    N Y J Dent; 1983 Dec; 53(8):377-8. PubMed ID: 6361634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Review of oral rehabilitation with the Linkow blade implant in private practice over a 6-year period].
    Wesche A
    Quintessenz; 1981 Feb; 32(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 7043553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone changes incident to blade-vent implants.
    Baratieri A; Sacchi A; Miani C
    J Biol Buccale; 1978 Jun; 6(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 81202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.