These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29083943)

  • 1. Assessing tether anchor labeling and usability in pickup trucks.
    Klinich KD; Manary MA; Malik LA; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):287-291. PubMed ID: 29083943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vehicle LATCH system features associated with correct child restraint installations.
    Klinich KD; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT; Manary MA; Moore JL; Wells JK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(5):520-31. PubMed ID: 23683089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting tether use and correct use in child restraint installations.
    Jermakian JS; Klinich KD; Orton NR; Flannagan CA; Manary MA; Malik LA; Narayanaswamy P
    J Safety Res; 2014 Dec; 51():99-108. PubMed ID: 25453183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of interventions to make top tether hardware more visible during child restraint system (CRS) installations.
    Mansfield JA; Zaragoza-Rivera YN; Baker GH; Bolte JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(5):534-539. PubMed ID: 31194584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vehicle characteristics associated with LATCH use and correct use in real-world child restraint installations.
    Cicchino JB; Jermakian JS
    J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():77-85. PubMed ID: 25934000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observed use of tethers in forward-facing child restraint systems.
    Jermakian JS; Wells JK
    Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 17(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 21422025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of child restraint system features on installation errors.
    Klinich KD; Manary MA; Flannagan CA; Ebert SM; Malik LA; Green PA; Reed MP
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Mar; 45(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 23731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
    Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observed LATCH use and misuse characteristics of child restraint systems in seven states.
    Decina LE; Lococo KH
    J Safety Res; 2007; 38(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 17617236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of top tethers with forward-facing child restraints: observations and driver interviews.
    Eichelberger AH; Decina LE; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2014 Feb; 48():71-6. PubMed ID: 24529094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observational study of child restraining practice on Norwegian high-speed roads: restraint misuse poses a major threat to child passenger safety.
    Skjerven-Martinsen ; Naess PA; Hansen TB; Staff T; Stray-Pedersen A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():479-86. PubMed ID: 23954682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of child restraint misuse on dynamic performance.
    Manary MA; Flannagan CAC; Reed MP; Orton NR; Klinich KD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 31670975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Head excursions of rearward-facing child restraint systems in rear impacts.
    Patton DA; Mansfield JA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):213-217. PubMed ID: 36657143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usability of non-standard lower anchor configurations for child restraint system (CRS) installation.
    Mansfield JA; Zaragoza-Rivera YN; Bolte JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S8-S13. PubMed ID: 30570335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) usability in school buses and passenger vehicles.
    Rudin-Brown CM; Scipione A; Armstrong J; Lai G; Salway A; Kumagai J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Oct; 9(5):472-82. PubMed ID: 18836959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Field use patterns and performance of child restraints secured by lower anchors and tethers for children (LATCH).
    Arbogast KB; Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):530-5. PubMed ID: 17270136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of Child Restraint System (CRS) Compatibility in the Vehicle Seat Environment.
    Bing JA; Bolte JH; Agnew AM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S1-8. PubMed ID: 26436217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumer usability of flexible vs. rigid lower anchor hardware in infant child restraint system (CRS) installations.
    Mansfield JA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S105-S110. PubMed ID: 35775879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.