147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29083987)
21. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.
Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Bone Marrow: An Adjunct Tool for the Diagnosis of a Diffuse MR Imaging Pattern in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.
Koutoulidis V; Fontara S; Terpos E; Zagouri F; Matsaridis D; Christoulas D; Panourgias E; Kastritis E; Dimopoulos MA; Moulopoulos LA
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):484-493. PubMed ID: 27610934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative Study of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging for Predicting Histologic Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Wu B; Jia F; Li X; Li L; Wang K; Han D
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():562049. PubMed ID: 33194630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Chen T; Li Y; Lu SS; Zhang YD; Wang XN; Luo CY; Shi HB
Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differential diagnosis of endometrioid and non-endometrioid cancer of the uterus.
Bakir VL; Bakir B; Sanli S; Yildiz SO; Iyibozkurt AC; Kartal MG; Yavuz E
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jun; 58(6):758-767. PubMed ID: 27664276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Amide Proton Transfer-weighted MRI in Predicting Histologic Grade of Bladder Cancer.
Wang HJ; Cai Q; Huang YP; Li MQ; Wen ZH; Lin YY; Ouyang LY; Qian L; Guo Y
Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):127-134. PubMed ID: 35762886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.
Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3T in distinguishing between adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium.
Lin YC; Lin G; Chen YR; Yen TC; Wang CC; Ng KK
Chang Gung Med J; 2011; 34(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 21392479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Grading glial tumors with amide proton transfer MR imaging: different analytical approaches.
Sakata A; Okada T; Yamamoto A; Kanagaki M; Fushimi Y; Okada T; Dodo T; Arakawa Y; Schmitt B; Miyamoto S; Togashi K
J Neurooncol; 2015 Apr; 122(2):339-48. PubMed ID: 25559689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Head and Neck Tumors: Amide Proton Transfer MRI.
Law BKH; King AD; Ai QY; Poon DMC; Chen W; Bhatia KS; Ahuja AT; Ma BB; Ka-Wai Yeung D; Fai Mo FK; Wang YX; Yuan J
Radiology; 2018 Sep; 288(3):782-790. PubMed ID: 29893646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Histogram Analysis of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging to Identify Contrast-enhancing Low-Grade Brain Tumor That Mimics High-Grade Tumor: Increased Accuracy of MR Perfusion.
Park JE; Kim HS; Park KJ; Choi CG; Kim SJ
Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):151-61. PubMed ID: 25910226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Malignant hepatic tumors: short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficients with breath-hold and respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH; Park SH; Kim JK; Park B; Kim N; Lee MG
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 20501719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Associations Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value With Pathological Type, Histologic Grade, and Presence of Lymph Node Metastases of Esophageal Carcinoma.
Wang Y; Bai G; Guo L; Chen W
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819892254. PubMed ID: 31782340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is the standard deviation of the apparent diffusion coefficient a potential tool for the preoperative prediction of tumor grade in endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Liang X; Zhao T; Ding C; Zhang M
Acta Radiol; 2020 Dec; 61(12):1724-1732. PubMed ID: 32366108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Whole-brain amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging in glioma patients using low-power steady-state pulsed chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 7T.
Heo HY; Jones CK; Hua J; Yadav N; Agarwal S; Zhou J; van Zijl PC; Pillai JJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 26663561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Amide proton transfer imaging of adult diffuse gliomas: correlation with histopathological grades.
Togao O; Yoshiura T; Keupp J; Hiwatashi A; Yamashita K; Kikuchi K; Suzuki Y; Suzuki SO; Iwaki T; Hata N; Mizoguchi M; Yoshimoto K; Sagiyama K; Takahashi M; Honda H
Neuro Oncol; 2014 Mar; 16(3):441-8. PubMed ID: 24305718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Histopathology of lung adenocarcinoma based on new IASLC/ATS/ERS classification: prognostic stratification with functional and metabolic imaging biomarkers.
Lee HY; Jeong JY; Lee KS; Yi CA; Kim BT; Kang H; Kwon OJ; Shim YM; Han J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):905-13. PubMed ID: 23908132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Using amide proton transfer to identify cervical squamous carcinoma/adenocarcinoma and evaluate its differentiation grade.
Meng N; Wang J; Sun J; Liu W; Wang X; Yan M; Dwivedi A; Zheng D; Wang K; Han D
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 61():9-15. PubMed ID: 31071471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. T1 hyperintense renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Kim S; Jain M; Harris AB; Lee VS; Babb JS; Sigmund EE; Rueff LE; Taouli B
Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):796-807. PubMed ID: 19380690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
