These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29084016)
1. Validation of a new piezoelectric device for noninvasive measurement of central aortic systolic blood pressure. Cuffaro PE; Morales MS; Barochiner J; Rada MA; Alfie J; Aparicio LS; Galarza CR; Micali RG; Marin MJ; Waisman GD Blood Press Monit; 2018 Feb; 23(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 29084016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device. Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement. Ding FH; Li Y; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Wang JG J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 23188416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of oscillometric aortic pressure and stiffness assessment using the VaSera VS-1500: comparison with a common tonometric method. Endes S; Bachler M; Li Y; Mayer C; Hanssen H; Hametner B; Schmidt-Trucksäss A; Wassertheurer S Blood Press Monit; 2015 Oct; 20(5):273-9. PubMed ID: 26065840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of central aortic blood pressure: a systematic meta-analysis of available techniques. Narayan O; Casan J; Szarski M; Dart AM; Meredith IT; Cameron JD J Hypertens; 2014 Sep; 32(9):1727-40. PubMed ID: 24937639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Vicorder, a novel cuff-based device for the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure. Pucci G; Cheriyan J; Hubsch A; Hickson SS; Gajendragadkar PR; Watson T; O'Sullivan M; Woodcock-Smith J; Schillaci G; Wilkinson IB; McEniery CM J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23079681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement. Ding FH; Fan WX; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang JG Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21976274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Central aortic blood pressure estimation in children and adolescents: results of the KidCoreBP study. Mynard JP; Goldsmith G; Springall G; Eastaugh L; Lane GK; Zannino D; Smolich JJ; Avolio A; Cheung MMH J Hypertens; 2020 May; 38(5):821-828. PubMed ID: 31790068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of noninvasive assessments of central blood pressure using general transfer function and late systolic shoulder of the radial pressure wave. Wohlfahrt P; Krajcoviechová A; Seidlerová J; Mayer O; Filipovsky J; Cífková R Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23999585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of high central blood pressure in young with isolated systolic hypertension. Radchenko GD; Torbas OO; Sirenko YM Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2016; 12():321-8. PubMed ID: 27536127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of central blood pressure devices on the basis of a modified protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: application to the Centron cBP301. Agnoletti D; Millasseau S; Topouchian J; Safar ME; Blacher J Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 24418970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of central blood pressure by a noninvasive method (brachial blood pressure and QKD interval): a noninvasive validation. Cremer A; Codjo L; Butlin M; Papaioannou G; Yeim S; Jan E; Kiat H; Avolio A; Gosse P J Hypertens; 2013 Sep; 31(9):1847-52. PubMed ID: 24036902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study. Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R; J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peripheral blood pressure measurement is as good as applanation tonometry at predicting ascending aortic blood pressure. Davies JI; Band MM; Pringle S; Ogston S; Struthers AD J Hypertens; 2003 Mar; 21(3):571-6. PubMed ID: 12640251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tonometric devices for central aortic systolic pressure measurements in patients with type 1 diabetes: comparison of the BPro and SphygmoCor devices. Theilade S; Hansen TW; Joergensen C; Lajer M; Rossing P Blood Press Monit; 2013 Jun; 18(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 23546451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech CT40 automated blood pressure measurement device by the 1993 British Hypertension Society protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization 81060-2: 2013 standard. Polo Friz H; Punzi V; Petri F; Orlandi R; Maggiolini D; Polo Friz M; Primitz L; Vighi G Blood Press Monit; 2017 Oct; 22(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 28763332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two noninvasive devices for measurement of central systolic blood pressure with invasive measurement during cardiac catheterization. Ott C; Haetinger S; Schneider MP; Pauschinger M; Schmieder RE J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2012 Sep; 14(9):575-9. PubMed ID: 22947354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuous Non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker® comparable to invasive intra-arterial pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery. Gratz I; Deal E; Spitz F; Baruch M; Allen IE; Seaman JE; Pukenas E; Jean S BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28327093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]