192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29084299)
1. Effects of Cement, Abutment Surface Pretreatment, and Artificial Aging on the Force Required to Detach Cantilever Fixed Dental Prostheses from Dental Implants.
Kappel S; Chepura T; Schmitter M; Rammelsberg P; Rues S
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(6):545–552. PubMed ID: 29084299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cemented Single Crown Retention on Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.
Rues S; Fugina M; Rammelsberg P; Kappel S
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):133-135. PubMed ID: 28267819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study.
Müller L; Rauch A; Reissmann DR; Schierz O
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):592. PubMed ID: 34798850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pull-off Force of Four Different Implant Cements Between Zirconia Crowns and Titanium Implant Abutments in Two Different Abutment Heights.
Volkmann H; Rauch A; Koenig A; Schierz O
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2022; 42(3):e67-e74. PubMed ID: 35472113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns.
Covey DA; Kent DK; St Germain HA; Koka S
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 10709044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Sandblasting of Titanium Implant-Abutment Surface on Bond Strength and Surface Topography.
El-Helbawy NG; El-Hatery AA; Ahmed MH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 27183064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Shahriari A; Steiner M; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention forces and seating discrepancies of implant-retained castings after cementation.
Wolfart M; Wolfart S; Kern M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):519-25. PubMed ID: 16955601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Retention Forces of Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings on Titanium Abutments Coated with Metal Opaquers Using Different Cements.
Lei W; Guo J; Du R; Shi B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 35476863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
