192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29084299)
21. Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Implant-supported Cement-retained Crowns with Short Abutments: An
Kalla K; Arunachalam S; Behera SSP; Konchada J; Lankapalli S; Vanisetti L
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec; 22(12):1451-1456. PubMed ID: 35656686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Abu-Sitta EH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 21039897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro influence of ultrasonic stress, removal force preload and thermocycling on the retrievability of implant-retained crowns.
Mehl C; Harder S; Schwarz D; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 21722192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Aluminum Oxide Sandblasting of Hexagonal Coping and Abutment: Influence on Retention and Marginal Leakage Using Temporary Cements.
Okuyama JY; de Brito RB; França FM
Implant Dent; 2016 Jun; 25(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 26990606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
Kokubo Y; Kano T; Tsumita M; Sakurai S; Itayama A; Fukushima S
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study.
Jugdev J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Lynch E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):784-90. PubMed ID: 25032757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retrospective comparison of semipermanent and permanent cementation of implant-supported single crowns and FDPs with regard to the incidence of survival and complications.
Schwarz S; Schröder C; Corcodel N; Hassel AJ; Rammelsberg P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e151-8. PubMed ID: 22081988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is There a Correlation Between Tensile Strength and Retrievability of Cemented Implant-Retained Crowns Using Artificial Aging?
Mehl C; Ali S; El Bahra S; Harder S; Vollrath O; Kern M
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 26757337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments.
Sadig WM; Al Harbi MW
Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 18091167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of precementation on minimizing residual cement around the marginal area of dental implants.
Wang W; Chang J; Wang HM; Gu XH
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):622-629. PubMed ID: 31383528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of the tensile strength of hexagonal abutments using different cementing agents.
Wahl C; França FM; Brito RB; Basting RT; Smanio H
Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19148383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study.
Santosa RE; Martin W; Morton D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
