These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient. Casale P; Grady RW; Joyner BD; Zeltser IS; Figueroa TE; Mitchell ME J Endourol; 2004 Nov; 18(9):875-8. PubMed ID: 15659924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Retroperitoneoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: modification of the procedure and our experience. Ou ZY; Chen JB; Chen Z; Chen MF; Liu LF; Zhou X; Li YL; Qi L; Zu XB Urol J; 2014 Sep; 11(4):1763-7. PubMed ID: 25194072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Retroperitoneoscopic assisted single-site pyeloplasty using EZ access in children: Comparison with open dismembered pyeloplasty. Yamazaki Y; Kim WJ; Akiyama S; Ikeda T J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Apr; 52(4):574-577. PubMed ID: 27717566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: long-term outcome and critical analysis of 10-year experience in a teaching center. Blanc T; Muller C; Abdoul H; Peev S; Paye-Jaouen A; Peycelon M; Carricaburu E; El-Ghoneimi A Eur Urol; 2013 Mar; 63(3):565-72. PubMed ID: 22902039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Improvement in Renal Function and Symptoms of Patients Treated with Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with Less Than 20% Split Renal Function. Nishi M; Matsumoto K; Fujita T; Iwamura M J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1214-1218. PubMed ID: 27626128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after failed open repair and endoscopic salvage]. Parma P; Samuelli A; Luciano M; Dall'Oglio B Urologia; 2014; 81 Suppl 23():S9-14. PubMed ID: 24665025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]