These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29085999)

  • 1. [LenSx® femto-LASIK, FEMTO LDV Z4® femto-LASIK, and PRK : Comparison of refractive results and an analysis of complications].
    Pahlitzsch T; Pahlitzsch ML; Sumarni U; Pahlitzsch M
    Ophthalmologe; 2018 Nov; 115(11):928-940. PubMed ID: 29085999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus PRK for high myopia: comparison of 18-month visual acuity and quality.
    Hashemi H; Ghaffari R; Miraftab M; Asgari S
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):995-1001. PubMed ID: 27699605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia.
    El-Maghraby A; Salah T; Waring GO; Klyce S; Ibrahim O
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 10080199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group.
    Steinert RF; Hersh PS
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK Versus PRK: Comparison of 6-Month Visual Acuity and Quality Outcome for High Myopia.
    Hashemi H; Miraftab M; Ghaffari R; Asgari S
    Eye Contact Lens; 2016 Nov; 42(6):354-357. PubMed ID: 26657666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism by femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Řeháková T; Veliká V; Jirásková N
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 31537074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: a control-matched study.
    Pop M; Payette Y
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 10690820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Past and present of corneal refractive surgery: a retrospective study of long-term results after photorefractive keratectomy and a prospective study of refractive lenticule extraction.
    Vestergaard AH
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Mar; 92 Thesis 2():1-21. PubMed ID: 24636364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy in the correction of myopic astigmatism.
    Fraunfelder FW; Wilson SE
    Cornea; 2001 May; 20(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 11333325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study.
    Hersh PS; Brint SF; Maloney RK; Durrie DS; Gordon M; Michelson MA; Thompson VM; Berkeley RB; Schein OD; Steinert RF
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Aug; 105(8):1512-22, discussion 1522-3. PubMed ID: 9709767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual outcomes after Epi-LASIK and PRK for low and moderate myopia.
    Sia RK; Coe CD; Edwards JD; Ryan DS; Bower KS
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 28(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 21985667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year case-matched analysis.
    Luger MH; Ewering T; Arba-Mosquera S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 27956284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy, astigmatic PRK, laser in situ keratomileusis, and astigmatic LASIK in the treatment of myopia.
    Van Gelder RN; Steger-May K; Yang SH; Rattanatam T; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Mar; 28(3):462-76. PubMed ID: 11973093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in central corneal thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.
    Kozak I; Hornak M; Juhas T; Shah A; Rawlings EF
    J Refract Surg; 2003; 19(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 12701720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Astigmatic changes after excimer laser refractive surgery.
    Yang SH; Van Gelder RN; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Mar; 28(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 11973094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femtosecond LASIK Retreatments After Primary Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy.
    Leccisotti A; Fields SV; De Bartolo G
    Cornea; 2023 Jun; 42(6):675-679. PubMed ID: 37146290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of visual quality after Femto-LASIK and TransPRK in patients with low and moderate myopia.
    Jiang J; Jhanji V; Sun L; Li J; Zhang R
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 40(6):1419-1428. PubMed ID: 32076966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flap creation with the three-dimensional, transportable Ziemer FEMTO LDV model Z6 I femtosecond laser.
    Pietilä J; Huhtala A; Mäkinen P; Salmenhaara K; Uusitalo H
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 92(7):650-5. PubMed ID: 24373615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study.
    Schallhorn JM; Schallhorn SC; Ou Y
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Mar; 122(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 25444636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of visual outcomes after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus flap-off epipolis LASIK for myopia.
    Piao J; Whang WJ; Joo CK
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):310. PubMed ID: 32727402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.