These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29086191)

  • 1. Public trust and 'ethics review' as a commodity: the case of Genomics England Limited and the UK's 100,000 genomes project.
    Samuel GN; Farsides B
    Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Jun; 21(2):159-168. PubMed ID: 29086191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public consultation in ethics: an experiment in representative ethics.
    Burgess MM
    J Bioeth Inq; 2004; 1(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 16025591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.
    Cave E; Holm S
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Oct; 28(5):318-21. PubMed ID: 12356961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The UK's 100,000 Genomes Project: manifesting policymakers' expectations.
    Samuel GN; Farsides B
    New Genet Soc; 2017; 36(4):336-353. PubMed ID: 29238265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomics research in the UK--the social science agenda.
    Diamond I; Woodgate D
    New Genet Soc; 2005; 24(2):239-52. PubMed ID: 16552936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negotiating Requests for Reimbursement for Community Engagement: Challenges in Developing an Educational Video for Genomic Biobanking Research in South Africa.
    Staunton C; Abayomi A; Bassa F; Moodley K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Dec; 14(5):501-503. PubMed ID: 31230513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomics England's implementation of its public engagement strategy: Blurred boundaries between engagement for the United Kingdom's 100,000 Genomes project and the need for public support.
    Samuel GN; Farsides B
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Apr; 27(3):352-364. PubMed ID: 29241419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices.
    Foster MW; Royal CD; Sharp RR
    J Med Ethics; 2006 Nov; 32(11):635-8. PubMed ID: 17074820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconsidering 'ethics' and 'quality' in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.
    Stevenson FA; Gibson W; Pelletier C; Chrysikou V; Park S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 May; 16():21. PubMed ID: 25952678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Better governance, better access: practising responsible data sharing in the METADAC governance infrastructure.
    Murtagh MJ; Blell MT; Butters OW; Cowley L; Dove ES; Goodman A; Griggs RL; Hall A; Hallowell N; Kumari M; Mangino M; Maughan B; Mills MC; Minion JT; Murphy T; Prior G; Suderman M; Ring SM; Rogers NT; Roberts SJ; Van der Straeten C; Viney W; Wiltshire D; Wong A; Walker N; Burton PR
    Hum Genomics; 2018 Apr; 12(1):24. PubMed ID: 29695297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.
    Petrova M; Barclay S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 30678668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Looking back, looking beyond: revisiting the ethics of genome generation.
    Bharadwaj M
    J Biosci; 2006 Mar; 31(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 16595885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A case report: ethics of a proposed qualitative study of hospital closure in an Australian rural community.
    Fraser J
    Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 21(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 14760052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facilitating ethical reflection among scientists using the ethical matrix.
    Jensen KK; Forsberg EM; Gamborg C; Millar K; Sandøe P
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Sep; 17(3):425-45. PubMed ID: 20589537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One stop or full stop? The continuing challenges for researchers despite the new streamlined NHS research governance process.
    Thompson AG; France EF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 May; 10():124. PubMed ID: 20465819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Governing UK Biobank: the importance of ensuring public trust.
    Tutton R; Kaye J; Hoeyer K
    Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):284-5. PubMed ID: 15158057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transparency, trust, and community welfare: towards a precision public health ethics framework for the genomics era.
    Juengst ET; Van Rie A
    Genome Med; 2020 Nov; 12(1):98. PubMed ID: 33218363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imagining genomic medicine futures in primary care: General practitioners' views on mainstreaming genomics in the National Health Service.
    Mwale S; Farsides B
    Sociol Health Illn; 2021 Nov; 43(9):2121-2140. PubMed ID: 34773708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hyped biomedical science or uncritical reporting? Press coverage of genomics (1992-2001) in Québec.
    Racine E; Gareau I; Doucet H; Laudy D; Jobin G; Schraedley-Desmond P
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Mar; 62(5):1278-90. PubMed ID: 16174544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.
    Tansey CM; Anderson J; Boulanger RF; Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Schwartz L; Hunt M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 28659166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.