These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29086325)

  • 1. Comparison of semi-automated center-dot and fully automated endothelial cell analyses from specular microscopy images.
    Maruoka S; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Katakami C; Tabuchi H; Chikama T; Kiuchi Y
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2495-2507. PubMed ID: 29086325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.
    Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Modak C; Marion K; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL
    J Optom; 2018; 11(3):182-191. PubMed ID: 28797649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endothelial cells analysis with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Cheung SW; Cho P
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):788-98. PubMed ID: 11120569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of endothelial cell analysis methods and recommendations for calibration in Topcon SP-2000P specular microscopy.
    van Schaick W; van Dooren BT; Mulder PG; Völker-Dieben HJ
    Cornea; 2005 Jul; 24(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 15968157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell measurements by Scheimpflug camera system and two noncontact specular microscopes.
    Karaca I; Yilmaz SG; Palamar M; Ates H
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1601-1609. PubMed ID: 28674859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corneal endothelium evaluation with 2 noncontact specular microscopes and their semiautomated methods of analysis.
    de Sanctis U; Machetta F; Razzano L; Dalmasso P; Grignolo FM
    Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16783136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of recording systems and analysis methods in specular microscopy.
    Ohno K; Nelson LR; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Cornea; 1999 Jul; 18(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 10422853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density estimated with 2 noncontact specular microscopes.
    Goldich Y; Marcovich AL; Barkana Y; Hartstein M; Morad Y; Avni I; Zadok D
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 20175056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement area and repeatability of semiautomated assessment of corneal endothelium in the Topcon specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Ding X; Huang Q; Zheng Y; Jiang Y; Huang S; He M
    Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1111-8. PubMed ID: 22902488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P.
    Cho P; Cheung SW
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):799-807. PubMed ID: 11120570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the corneal endothelium using noncontact and contact specular microscopy.
    Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A; Módis L
    Cornea; 2011 May; 30(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 21598434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Could the coefficient of variation (COV) of the corneal endothelium be overestimated when a centre-dot method is used?
    Doughty MJ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Jan; 91(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 18045256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Noncontact Specular and Confocal Microscopy for Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium.
    Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S144-S150. PubMed ID: 28346276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of endothelial cell count using confocal and contact specular microscopy.
    Klais CM; Bühren J; Kohnen T
    Ophthalmologica; 2003; 217(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 12592045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrepancies in Endothelial Cell Density Values of Human Donor Corneas Resulting From Comparison Between Specular Microscopes and Endothelial Analysis Methods.
    Shi Y; Huang J; Conrick P; Hoover C; Lee OL
    Cornea; 2020 Apr; 39(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 31738243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial morphology using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy, and Confoscan 4 confocal microscopy.
    Al Farhan HM; Al Otaibi WM; Al Razqan HM; Al Harqan AA
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 13():73. PubMed ID: 24274022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further analysis of assessments of the coefficient of variation of corneal endothelial cell areas from specular microscopic images.
    Doughty MJ; Aakre BM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Sep; 91(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 18537989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes.
    Gasser L; Reinhard T; Böhringer D
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26219961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement of Corneal Endothelial Cell Analysis Between Konan-Noncon Robo SP-6000 and Tomey EM-3000 Specular Microscopes in Healthy Subjects.
    Jbara D; Achiron A; Antman G; Buhbut O; Hecht I; Tuuminen R; Bahar I; Elbaz U
    Eye Contact Lens; 2021 Apr; 47(4):191-195. PubMed ID: 32443012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central and Peripheral Corneal Endothelial Cell Analysis With Slit-Scanning Wide-Field Contact Specular Microscopy: Agreement With Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
    Lee J; Mori Y; Ogata M; Minami K; Miyata K
    Cornea; 2019 Sep; 38(9):1137-1141. PubMed ID: 31394553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.