These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29086652)

  • 21. North Florida Women's Health Services v. State.
    Florida. Supreme Court
    Wests South Report; 2003; 866():612-74. PubMed ID: 16479690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Congressional control of federal court jurisdiction: the case study of abortion.
    Greenwood JS
    S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(4):1069-112. PubMed ID: 16493841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. It's my body, it's my choice: the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Kushnir TF
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2004; 35(4):1117-88. PubMed ID: 15732189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The US Supreme Court abortion verdict is a tragedy. This is how research organizations can help.
    Nature; 2022 Jun; 606(7916):839-840. PubMed ID: 35764803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The male abortion: the putative father's right to terminate his interests in and obligations to the unborn child.
    McCulley MG
    J Law Policy; 1988; 7(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 12666677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Carhart case and late-term abortions -- what's next in Australia?
    Faunce T; Jefferys S
    J Law Med; 2007 Aug; 15(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 17902487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Abortion safety as subterfuge sets a dangerous precedent.
    Goozner M
    Mod Healthc; 2016 Feb; 46(9):36. PubMed ID: 27079024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. USA continues war over abortion.
    Lancet; 2003 Nov; 362(9395):1509. PubMed ID: 14615100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Jon O. Newman and the abortion decisions: a remarkable first year.
    Hurwitz AD
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 2002-2003; 46(1-2):231-47. PubMed ID: 16493839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stenberg v. Carhart: have the states lost their power to regulate abortion?
    Gauthier AM
    New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(3):625-68. PubMed ID: 15212038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Gordon A
    Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Physician Attack on the FDA - Will the Supreme Court Reduce Access to Mifepristone?
    Watson K
    N Engl J Med; 2024 Feb; 390(6):563-567. PubMed ID: 38265642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Roe revisited: a grim fairy tale.
    Roden GJ
    Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(2):49-57. PubMed ID: 15540376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion in America: is compromise possible?
    Hodges SA
    J Legal Stud; 1999-2000; 10():175-89. PubMed ID: 15991406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preface. Abortion is safer than childbirth.
    Bostrom BA
    Issues Law Med; 2014; 29(2):iii-iv. PubMed ID: 25936206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Partial-truth abortion bans.
    Kaminer W
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 16830438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. US Supreme Court to hear challenge to restrictive Texas abortion law.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2015 Nov; 351():h6177. PubMed ID: 26573104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. US Supreme Court delays enforcement of strict Texas abortion law.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g6304. PubMed ID: 25354191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.