These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29088321)

  • 1. Performance of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing Protocol Validity Indices.
    Manderino LM; Gunstad J
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Aug; 33(5):596-605. PubMed ID: 29088321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Convergent and discriminant validity of the Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing Battery (ImPACT) in young athletes.
    Koehl LM; Walls BD; Brothers SL; Morris SN; Glueck AC; Schmitt FA; Berry DTR; Han DY
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2019; 8(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 29465268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rates and Predictors of Invalid Baseline Test Performance in High School and Collegiate Athletes for 3 Computerized Neurocognitive Tests: ANAM, Axon Sports, and ImPACT.
    Nelson LD; Pfaller AY; Rein LE; McCrea MA
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):2018-26. PubMed ID: 26059178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing Preseason Baseline Cognitive Functioning in High School Student Athletes: A "Hybrid" Approach.
    Ransom DM; Ahumada L; Amankwah EK; Katzenstein JM; Goldenberg NA; Mularoni PP
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Oct; 37(7):1545-1554. PubMed ID: 35570831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.
    Brett BL; Solomon GS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 39(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 27585635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Baseline Neurocognitive Performance and Clearance for Athletes to Return to Contact.
    Asken BM; Clugston JR; Snyder AR; Bauer RM
    J Athl Train; 2017 Jan; 52(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 27905859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved post-injury cognitive test results: examining invalid baseline ImPACT testing.
    Manderino LM; Gunstad J
    Brain Inj; 2022 Mar; 36(4):572-578. PubMed ID: 35108142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Examination of Adolescent Athletes and Nonathletes on Baseline Neuropsychological Test Scores.
    Tomczyk CP; Mormile M; Wittenberg MS; Langdon JL; Hunt TN
    J Athl Train; 2018 Apr; 53(4):404-409. PubMed ID: 29543036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Financial incentives influence ImPACT validity indices but not cognitive composite scores.
    Merritt VC; Rabinowitz AR; Guty E; Meyer JE; Greenberg LS; Arnett PA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Apr; 41(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 30516088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concussion symptoms and neurocognitive performance of high school and college athletes who incur multiple concussions.
    Covassin T; Moran R; Wilhelm K
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2885-9. PubMed ID: 23959963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes.
    Schatz P; Pardini JE; Lovell MR; Collins MW; Podell K
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Jan; 21(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16143492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-reported history of seizure and baseline neurocognitive test performance in student-athletes: an initial investigation.
    Zalneraitis BH; Yengo-Kahn AM; Pawlukiewicz AJ; Solomon GS
    Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Nov; 45(4):470-474. PubMed ID: 28838286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity and specificity of the online version of ImPACT in high school and collegiate athletes.
    Schatz P; Sandel N
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 23144368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuropsychological test performance in depressed and nondepressed collegiate athletes following concussion.
    Riegler KE; Guty ET; Arnett PA
    Neuropsychology; 2020 Jan; 34(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 31343237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport.
    Harmon KG; Drezner JA; Gammons M; Guskiewicz KM; Halstead M; Herring SA; Kutcher JS; Pana A; Putukian M; Roberts WO
    Br J Sports Med; 2013 Jan; 47(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 23243113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuropsychological testing for sports-related concussion: how athletes can sandbag their baseline testing without detection.
    Erdal K
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Aug; 27(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 22684033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
    Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and Reliability of Baseline Testing in a Standardized Environment.
    Higgins KL; Caze T; Maerlender A
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Jun; 33(4):437-443. PubMed ID: 28961684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel ImPACT validity indices in collegiate student-athletes with and without histories of ADHD or academic difficulties.
    Manderino LM; Zachman AM; Gunstad J
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30516427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-retest, retest, and retest: Growth curve models of repeat testing with Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).
    Maerlender AC; Masterson CJ; James TD; Beckwith J; Brolinson PG; Crisco J; Duma S; Flashman LA; Greenwald R; Rowson S; Wilcox B; McAllister TW
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Oct; 38(8):869-74. PubMed ID: 27266563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.