BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29088749)

  • 1. Identification and validation of a prognostic 9-genes expression signature for gastric cancer.
    Wang Z; Chen G; Wang Q; Lu W; Xu M
    Oncotarget; 2017 Sep; 8(43):73826-73836. PubMed ID: 29088749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of a prognostic 5-Gene expression signature for gastric cancer.
    Hou JY; Wang YG; Ma SJ; Yang BY; Li QP
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Apr; 143(4):619-629. PubMed ID: 28035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification and Validation of a Novel Prognostic Gene Model for Colorectal Cancer.
    Meng Y; Zhou R; Lin Z; Peng Q; Ding J; Huang M; Li Y; Guo X; Zhuang K
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():9774219. PubMed ID: 35924107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of a nine-gene prognostic signature for gastric carcinoma using integrated bioinformatics analyses.
    Wu KZ; Xu XH; Zhan CP; Li J; Jiang JL
    World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2020 Sep; 12(9):975-991. PubMed ID: 33005292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of Potential Key Genes Associated With the Pathogenesis and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Based on Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis.
    Liu X; Wu J; Zhang D; Bing Z; Tian J; Ni M; Zhang X; Meng Z; Liu S
    Front Genet; 2018; 9():265. PubMed ID: 30065754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Melanoma long non-coding RNA signature predicts prognostic survival and directs clinical risk-specific treatments.
    Chen X; Guo W; Xu XJ; Su F; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang Q; Zhu L
    J Dermatol Sci; 2017 Mar; 85(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 27955882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prognostic 4-gene expression signature for squamous cell lung carcinoma.
    Li J; Wang J; Chen Y; Yang L; Chen S
    J Cell Physiol; 2017 Dec; 232(12):3702-3713. PubMed ID: 28160492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of DNA repair genes as prognostic indicators of gastric cancer.
    Jinjia C; Xiaoyu W; Hui S; Wenhua L; Zhe Z; Xiaodong Z; Midie X
    J Cancer; 2019; 10(20):4866-4875. PubMed ID: 31598158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel strategy to identify candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for gastric cancer.
    Liu L; Pang H; He Q; Pan B; Sun X; Shan J; Wu L; Wu K; Yao X; Guo Y
    Cancer Cell Int; 2021 Jul; 21(1):335. PubMed ID: 34215253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High DAPK1 Expression Promotes Tumor Metastasis of Gastric Cancer.
    Wang Q; Weng S; Sun Y; Lin Y; Zhong W; Kwok HF; Lin Y
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 36290392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification and validation of a Hedgehog pathway-based 3-gene prognostic signature for gastric cancers.
    Wu J; Wang X; Lu W
    Oncol Lett; 2018 Aug; 16(2):2263-2270. PubMed ID: 30008928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive analysis of a novel four-lncRNA signature as a prognostic biomarker for human gastric cancer.
    Miao Y; Sui J; Xu SY; Liang GY; Pu YP; Yin LH
    Oncotarget; 2017 Sep; 8(43):75007-75024. PubMed ID: 29088841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of a five-lncRNA signature for the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer.
    Fan ZY; Liu W; Yan C; Zhu ZL; Xu W; Li JF; Su L; Li C; Zhu ZG; Liu B; Yan M
    Tumour Biol; 2016 Oct; 37(10):13265-13277. PubMed ID: 27460075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unsupervised analysis reveals two molecular subgroups of serous ovarian cancer with distinct gene expression profiles and survival.
    Lisowska KM; Olbryt M; Student S; Kujawa KA; Cortez AJ; Simek K; Dansonka-Mieszkowska A; Rzepecka IK; Tudrej P; Kupryjańczyk J
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 142(6):1239-52. PubMed ID: 27028324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of public cancer datasets and signatures identifies TP53 mutant signatures with robust prognostic and predictive value.
    Lehmann BD; Ding Y; Viox DJ; Jiang M; Zheng Y; Liao W; Chen X; Xiang W; Yi Y
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Mar; 15():179. PubMed ID: 25886164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Generation and Validation of a 20-Genes Model Influencing the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer.
    Xie XJ; Liu P; Cai CD; Zhuang YR; Zhang L; Zhuang HW
    J Cell Biochem; 2017 Nov; 118(11):3675-3685. PubMed ID: 28370286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GRIK3: A novel oncogenic protein related to tumor TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis of GC.
    Gong B; Li Y; Cheng Z; Wang P; Luo L; Huang H; Duan S; Liu F
    Tumour Biol; 2017 Jun; 39(6):1010428317704364. PubMed ID: 28631555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a cytokine gene expression signature in lung adenocarcinoma and the surrounding tissue as a prognostic classifier.
    Seike M; Yanaihara N; Bowman ED; Zanetti KA; Budhu A; Kumamoto K; Mechanic LE; Matsumoto S; Yokota J; Shibata T; Sugimura H; Gemma A; Kudoh S; Wang XW; Harris CC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(16):1257-69. PubMed ID: 17686824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehensive analysis of the prognostic value of the chemokine-like factor-like MARVEL transmembrane domain-containing family in gastric cancer.
    Liang Z; Xie J; Huang L; Huang Y; Zhang Y; Ma R; Zheng Z; Wang Q; Li X
    J Gastrointest Oncol; 2021 Apr; 12(2):388-406. PubMed ID: 34012634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Circulating levels of GDF15, MMP7 and miR-200c as a poor prognostic signature in gastric cancer.
    Blanco-Calvo M; Tarrío N; Reboredo M; Haz-Conde M; García J; Quindós M; Figueroa A; Antón-Aparicio L; Calvo L; Valladares-Ayerbes M
    Future Oncol; 2014 May; 10(7):1187-202. PubMed ID: 24947260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.