BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2908905)

  • 1. Ingredients of a successful grant application to the National Institutes of Health.
    Gordon SL
    J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(1):138-41. PubMed ID: 2908905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The project-grant application of the National Institutes of Health. Preparation of the project-grant applications: assistance from the grantee institution's experienced investigators.
    Schimke RT
    Fed Proc; 1973 May; 32(5):1548-50. PubMed ID: 4705200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A curbstone consult to applicants for National Institute of Mental Health grant support.
    Rush AJ; Gullion CM; Prien RF
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1996; 32(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 8961773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The project-grant application of the National Institutes of Health. The grant application: an exercise in scientific writing.
    Eaves GN
    Fed Proc; 1973 May; 32(5):1541-3. PubMed ID: 4705195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The project-grant application of the National Institutes of Health. Preparation of the project-grant application: assistance from the Institutes and other awarding units.
    Malone TE
    Fed Proc; 1973 May; 32(5):1546-7. PubMed ID: 4705198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The peer review process: how to prepare research grant applications to the NIH.
    Novello AC
    Miner Electrolyte Metab; 1985; 11(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 4047004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The project-grant application of the National Institutes of Health. Preparation of the project-grant application: assistance from the administrator in charge of a study section.
    Gee HH
    Fed Proc; 1973 May; 32(5):1544-5. PubMed ID: 4705197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The project-grant application of the National Institutes of Health. Participation of the administration of the grantee institution in the preparation and transmission of a project-grant application.
    Ross R
    Fed Proc; 1973 May; 32(5):1547-8. PubMed ID: 4705199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to write an NIH R13 conference grant application.
    Sonis JH; Triffleman E; King L; King D
    Acad Psychiatry; 2009; 33(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19574528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The project-grant application of the National Institutues of Health. A beginning scientist's first project-grant application.
    Rifkin DB
    Fed Proc; 1973 May; 32(5):1543. PubMed ID: 4705196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Site visits for the review of grant applications to the National Institutes of Health: Views of an applicant and a scientist administrator.
    Merritt DH; Eaves GN
    Fed Proc; 1975 Feb; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 1116610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the general clinical research center in promoting patient-oriented research into the mechanisms of disease.
    Luft FC
    J Mol Med (Berl); 1997 Aug; 75(8):545-50. PubMed ID: 9297622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who reads your project-grant application to the National Institutes of Health?
    Eaves GN
    Fed Proc; 1972; 31(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 5009665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protecting an endangered species: training physicians to conduct clinical research.
    Goldhamer ME; Cohen AP; Bates DW; Cook EF; Davis RB; Singer DE; Simon SR
    Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):439-45. PubMed ID: 19318774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obtaining an NIH grant: basic building blocks.
    Stone EJ
    Cardiovasc Nurs; 1989; 25(2):7-11. PubMed ID: 2924331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National institutes of health funding for surgical research.
    Mann M; Tendulkar A; Birger N; Howard C; Ratcliffe MB
    Ann Surg; 2008 Feb; 247(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 18216525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomedical research funding: when the game gets tough, winners start to play.
    Ascoli GA
    Bioessays; 2007 Sep; 29(9):933-6. PubMed ID: 17688241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific impact: opportunity and necessity.
    Cohen MZ; Alexander GL; Wyman JF; Fahrenwald NL; Porock D; Wurzbach ME; Rawl SM; Conn VS
    West J Nurs Res; 2010 Aug; 32(5):578-90. PubMed ID: 20693335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Little science, big science: strategies for research portfolio selection in academic surgery departments.
    Shah A; Pietrobon R; Cook C; Sheth NP; Nguyen L; Guo L; Jacobs DO; Kuo PC
    Ann Surg; 2007 Dec; 246(6):1110-5. PubMed ID: 18043118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.