These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29089917)

  • 1. Violation of the Sphericity Assumption and Its Effect on Type-I Error Rates in Repeated Measures ANOVA and Multi-Level Linear Models (MLM).
    Haverkamp N; Beauducel A
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1841. PubMed ID: 29089917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeated measures ANOVA and adjusted
    Blanca MJ; Arnau J; García-Castro FJ; Alarcón R; Bono R
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1192453. PubMed ID: 37711324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applications of multivariate modeling to neuroimaging group analysis: a comprehensive alternative to univariate general linear model.
    Chen G; Adleman NE; Saad ZS; Leibenluft E; Cox RW
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():571-88. PubMed ID: 24954281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommendations for analysis of repeated-measures designs: testing and correcting for sphericity and use of manova and mixed model analysis.
    Armstrong RA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep; 37(5):585-593. PubMed ID: 28726257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advancing the science of spatial neglect rehabilitation: an improved statistical approach with mixed linear modeling.
    Goedert KM; Boston RC; Barrett AM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():211. PubMed ID: 23730283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-normal Data in Repeated Measures ANOVA: Impact on Type I Error and Power.
    Blanca MJ; Arnau J; García-Castro FJ; Alarcón R; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2023 Feb; 35(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36695847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sphericity estimation bias for repeated measures designs in simulation studies.
    Bono R; Arnau J; Blanca MJ; Alarcón R
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1621-1630. PubMed ID: 26489849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of the violation of normality and sphericity in the linear mixed model in split-plot designs].
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2012; 24(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 22748739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new approach for modeling generalization gradients: a case for hierarchical models.
    Vanbrabant K; Boddez Y; Verduyn P; Mestdagh M; Hermans D; Raes F
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():652. PubMed ID: 26074834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the robustness of repeated measures analyses: the case of small sample sizes and nonnormal data.
    Oberfeld D; Franke T
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):792-812. PubMed ID: 23184532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should we rely on the Kenward-Roger approximation when using linear mixed models if the groups have different distributions?
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):408-29. PubMed ID: 24028625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the linear mixed model to analyze nonnormal data distributions in longitudinal designs.
    Arnau J; Bono R; Blanca MJ; Bendayan R
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1224-38. PubMed ID: 22399245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of skewness and kurtosis on the robustness of linear mixed models.
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):873-9. PubMed ID: 23299397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variable error: variance-covariance heterogeneity, block size and type L error rates.
    Gessaroli ME; Schutz RW
    J Mot Behav; 1983 Mar; 15(1):74-95. PubMed ID: 15151885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology.
    Bagiella E; Sloan RP; Heitjan DF
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jan; 37(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10705763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and Precision of an Effect Size and Its Variance From a Multilevel Model for Cluster Randomized Trials: A Simulation Study.
    Ames AJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2013 Jul; 48(4):592-618. PubMed ID: 26742005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of skewness and kurtosis on the Kenward-Roger approximation when group distributions differ.
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2014 May; 26(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 24755032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of heteroscedasticity between treatment groups on mixed-effects models for repeated measures.
    Gosho M; Maruo K
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):578-592. PubMed ID: 29978944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of multiple-period group randomized trials: random coefficients model or repeated measures ANOVA?
    Moyer JC; Heagerty PJ; Murray DM
    Trials; 2022 Dec; 23(1):987. PubMed ID: 36476294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: trimmed means and bootstrapping.
    Keselman HJ; Kowalchuk RK; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2000 Nov; 53 ( Pt 2)():175-91. PubMed ID: 11109703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.