These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29090331)

  • 1. Differentiation of grade II/III and grade IV glioma by combining "T1 contrast-enhanced brain perfusion imaging" and susceptibility-weighted quantitative imaging.
    Saini J; Gupta PK; Sahoo P; Singh A; Patir R; Ahlawat S; Beniwal M; Thennarasu K; Santosh V; Gupta RK
    Neuroradiology; 2018 Jan; 60(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 29090331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative vs. semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals in patients with different grades of glioma.
    Bhattacharjee R; Gupta RK; Patir R; Vaishya S; Ahlawat S; Singh A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 51(1):225-233. PubMed ID: 31087724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glioma grading by microvascular permeability parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and intratumoral susceptibility signal on susceptibility weighted imaging.
    Li X; Zhu Y; Kang H; Zhang Y; Liang H; Wang S; Zhang W
    Cancer Imaging; 2015 Mar; 15(1):4. PubMed ID: 25889239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading.
    Su CQ; Lu SS; Han QY; Zhou MD; Hong XN
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):777-787. PubMed ID: 30244590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of cerebral gliomas using rCBV measurements during sequential acquisition of T1-perfusion and T2*-perfusion MRI.
    Saini J; Gupta RK; Kumar M; Singh A; Saha I; Santosh V; Beniwal M; Kandavel T; Cauteren MV
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215400. PubMed ID: 31017934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Different Post-Processing Algorithms for Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Imaging of Cerebral Gliomas.
    Kudo K; Uwano I; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nakamura H; Fujima N; Yamashita F; Goodwin J; Higuchi S; Sasaki M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 16(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27646457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging of Glioma: Update on Current Imaging Status and Future Directions.
    Hsu CC; Watkins TW; Kwan GN; Haacke EM
    J Neuroimaging; 2016 Jul; 26(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 27227542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
    Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Grading of Gliomas.
    Arevalo-Perez J; Peck KK; Young RJ; Holodny AI; Karimi S; Lyo JK
    J Neuroimaging; 2015; 25(5):792-8. PubMed ID: 25867683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glioma grading using a machine-learning framework based on optimized features obtained from T
    Sengupta A; Ramaniharan AK; Gupta RK; Agarwal S; Singh A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 50(4):1295-1306. PubMed ID: 30895704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined value of susceptibility-weighted and perfusion-weighted imaging in assessing who grade for brain astrocytomas.
    Wang XC; Zhang H; Tan Y; Qin JB; Wu XF; Wang L; Zhang L
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1569-74. PubMed ID: 24987755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal DSC-MRI for Distinguishing Tumor Recurrence From Pseudoprogression in Patients With a High-grade Glioma.
    Boxerman JL; Ellingson BM; Jeyapalan S; Elinzano H; Harris RJ; Rogg JM; Pope WB; Safran H
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2017 Jun; 40(3):228-234. PubMed ID: 25436828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.
    Xie T; Chen X; Fang J; Kang H; Xue W; Tong H; Cao P; Wang S; Yang Y; Zhang W
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1099-1111. PubMed ID: 28845594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amide proton transfer imaging to discriminate between low- and high-grade gliomas: added value to apparent diffusion coefficient and relative cerebral blood volume.
    Choi YS; Ahn SS; Lee SK; Chang JH; Kang SG; Kim SH; Zhou J
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3181-3189. PubMed ID: 28116517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion-weighted MRI combined with susceptibility-weighted MRI: added diagnostic value for four common lateral ventricular tumors.
    Yu Y; Zhang H; Xiao Z; She D; Xing Z; Yang X; Cao D
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Aug; 59(8):980-987. PubMed ID: 29065704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facing contrast-enhancing gliomas: perfusion MRI in grade III and grade IV gliomas according to tumor area.
    Di Stefano AL; Bergsland N; Berzero G; Farina L; Rognone E; Gastaldi M; Aquino D; Frati A; Tomasello F; Ceroni M; Marchioni E; Bastianello S
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():154350. PubMed ID: 24800207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assesment of perfusion in glial tumors with arterial spin labeling; comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast method.
    Cebeci H; Aydin O; Ozturk-Isik E; Gumus C; Inecikli F; Bekar A; Kocaeli H; Hakyemez B
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1914-9. PubMed ID: 25087109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glioma: Application of histogram analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to tumor grading.
    Jung SC; Yeom JA; Kim JH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Shin H; Lee AL; Yun TJ; Park CK; Sohn CH; Park SH; Choi SH
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Jun; 35(6):1103-10. PubMed ID: 24384119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic Values of DCE-MRI and DSC-MRI for Differentiation Between High-grade and Low-grade Gliomas: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.
    Liang J; Liu D; Gao P; Zhang D; Chen H; Shi C; Luo L
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 29223713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic Value of Fractal Analysis for the Differentiation of Brain Tumors Using 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging.
    Di Ieva A; Le Reste PJ; Carsin-Nicol B; Ferre JC; Cusimano MD
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Dec; 79(6):839-846. PubMed ID: 27332779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.