These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29090975)

  • 41. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts.
    Lee A; Okayasu K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20147811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Three-dimensional location of the retaining screw axis for a cemented single tooth implant restoration.
    Wicks R; Shintaku WH; Johnson A
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Aug; 21(6):491-3. PubMed ID: 22823426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Is There a Correlation Between Tensile Strength and Retrievability of Cemented Implant-Retained Crowns Using Artificial Aging?
    Mehl C; Ali S; El Bahra S; Harder S; Vollrath O; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 26757337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
    Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A conservative approach to localize loose implant screw through cemented crown: an in vitro experimental study.
    Saeed KMM; Al-Zahawi AR
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):617. PubMed ID: 38807096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Using a porcelain furnace to debond cement-retained implant crown from the abutment after screw fracture: a clinical report.
    Saponaro PC; Heshmati RH; Lee DJ
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Apr; 24(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 25316610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
    Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A three-dimensional image-superimposition CAD/CAM technique to record the position and angulation of the implant abutment screw access channel.
    Park JI; Yoon TH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 23328198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results.
    Cacaci C; Cantner F; Mücke T; Randelzhofer P; Hajtó J; Beuer F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jul; 21(6):1953-1959. PubMed ID: 27796574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Survival of various implant-supported prosthesis designs following 36 months of clinical function.
    Rodriguez AM; Orenstein IH; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 11885168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Edentulous arch treatment with a CAD/CAM screw-retained framework and cemented crowns: a clinical case report.
    Baig MR; Rajan G; Rajan M
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20017646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis with a microlocking implant prosthetic system: A clinical report.
    Choi JW; Lee JJ; Bae EB; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 31076165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. New ways of designing suprastructures for fixed implant-supported prostheses.
    Salenbauch NM; Langner J
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Dec; 18(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 10321175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A Protocol for Screw-Retrievable, Cement-Retained, Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures.
    AlHelal A; Kattadiyil MT; AlBader B; Clark JL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(6):577–580. PubMed ID: 29084296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Multicenter retrospective study of cement-retained implant-supported anterior partial prostheses: success and restoration evaluation.
    Khraisat A; Jebreen SE; Baqain ZH; Smadi L; Bakaeen L; Abu-Hammad O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):705-8. PubMed ID: 18807568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A new prosthodontic technique for fabricating cement-retained implant-supported prostheses.
    Wat PY; Pow EH; Chow TW
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 11203924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Guidelines for implant abutment selection for partially edentulous patients.
    Drago C; Lazzara RJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31(1):14-20, 23-4, 26-7; quiz 28, 44. PubMed ID: 20158014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.