These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29090979)

  • 21. [Finite element analysis of the angulation designment of implant planning in the anterior maxilla].
    Han LH; Qiu XX; Xing XN; Cai LY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Apr; 24(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 25938143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stress distribution on scalloped implants with different microthread and connection configurations using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Choi KS; Park SH; Lee JH; Jeon YC; Yun MJ; Jeong CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e29-38. PubMed ID: 22616069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a passive and friction fit implant abutment interface and the influence of occlusal table dimension on the stress distribution pattern on the implant and surrounding bone.
    Sarfaraz H; Paulose A; Shenoy KK; Hussain A
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2015; 15(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 26929518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of lubricant on screw preload and stresses in a finite element model for a dental implant.
    Jörn D; Kohorst P; Besdo S; Rücker M; Stiesch M; Borchers L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):340-8. PubMed ID: 24529658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of the coefficient of friction and tightening speed on the preload induced at the dental implant complex with the finite element method.
    Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Geramipanah F; Safari H; Paknejad M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 25749081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of stress distribution in and around dental implants using three different implant-abutment interfaces with platform-switched and non-platform-switched abutments: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Mitra D; Gurav P; Rodrigues S; Khobragade B; Mahajan A
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2023; 17(4):256-264. PubMed ID: 38584996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanical evaluation of an implant-abutment self-locking taper connection: finite element analysis and experimental tests.
    Sannino G; Barlattani A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e17-26. PubMed ID: 23377078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface.
    Canay S; Akça K
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
    Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An evaluation of new designs in implant-abutment connections: a finite element method assessment.
    Covani U; Ricci M; Tonelli P; Barone A
    Implant Dent; 2013 Jun; 22(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 23619750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the fracture resistance of dental implants with different abutment taper angles.
    Wang K; Geng J; Jones D; Xu W
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Jun; 63():164-71. PubMed ID: 27040208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanical analysis of a dental implant system under 3 contact conditions and with 2 mechanical factors.
    Chang HC; Li HY; Chen YN; Chang CH; Wang CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Oct; 122(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 30948302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal.
    Angeles Maslucan R; Dominguez JA
    Materials (Basel); 2022 May; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 35629709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biomechanical analysis of the press-fit effect in a conical Morse taper implant system by using an in vitro experimental test and finite element analysis.
    Chang HC; Chang CH; Li HY; Wang CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):601-608. PubMed ID: 33349465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
    Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Probability of survival and stress distribution of narrow diameter implants with different implant-abutment taper angles.
    Freitas MIM; Gomes RS; Ruggiero MM; Bergamo ETP; Bonfante EA; Marcello-Machado RM; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Mar; 110(3):638-645. PubMed ID: 34559448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.