These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29091008)
1. Effect of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood PET Reconstruction Compared With Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization on Clinical Image Quality Over a Wide Range of Patient Weights. Chilcott AK; Bradley KM; McGowan DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 29091008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical evaluation of the impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on PET FDG metrics. Vallot D; Caselles O; Chaltiel L; Fernandez A; Gabiache E; Dierickx L; Zerdoud S; Bauriaud M; Courbon F Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Nov; 38(11):979-984. PubMed ID: 29045338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size. Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [ Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases? Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes of [ Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian penalized likelihood PET reconstruction impact on quantitative metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Young JR; Mugu VK; Johnson GB; Ehman EC; Packard AT; Homb AC; Nathan MA; Thanarajasingam G; Kemp BJ Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32665. PubMed ID: 36820562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm suppresses edge artifacts in PET reconstruction based on point-spread-function. Yamaguchi S; Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Ishii K; Inoue K; Fukushi M Phys Med; 2018 Mar; 47():73-79. PubMed ID: 29609821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Novel penalised likelihood reconstruction of PET in the assessment of histologically verified small pulmonary nodules. Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Bradley KM; Belcher E; Black E; Gleeson FV Eur Radiol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):576-84. PubMed ID: 25991490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment response assessment in [ Dolci C; Spadavecchia C; Crivellaro C; De Ponti E; Todde S; Morzenti S; Turolla EA; Crespi A; Guerra L; Landoni C Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():177-182. PubMed ID: 30738523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Application of a High Sensitivity BGO PET/CT Scanner: Effects of Acquisition Protocols and Reconstruction Parameters on Lesions Quantification. De Ponti E; Crivellaro C; Morzenti S; Monaco L; Todde S; Landoni C; Elisei F; Musarra M; Guerra L Curr Radiopharm; 2022; 15(3):218-227. PubMed ID: 34994322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Influence of Reconstruction FOV and Matrix Size on the Quantitative Accuracy of FDG-PET: Comparison between OSEM and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood]. Mikami S; Nakamura F; Nakamura A; Torizuka T Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(5):454-462. PubMed ID: 34011788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System. Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies. Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical effectiveness of reconstructing Usmani S; Ahmed N; Gnanasegaran G; Rasheed R; Marafi F; Alnaaimi M; Omar M; Musbah A; Al Kandari F; De Schepper S; Van den Wyngaert T Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20210043. PubMed ID: 33571003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]