These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29091015)
1. Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes of Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: A Comparison of Metal-Acrylic, Milled Zirconia, and Retrievable Crown Prostheses. Box VH; Sukotjo C; Knoernschild KL; Campbell SD; Afshari FS J Oral Implantol; 2018 Feb; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 29091015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications and patient-centered outcomes with an implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prosthesis: 1 year results. Limmer B; Sanders AE; Reside G; Cooper LF J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 24393461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing zirconia implant fixed complete prostheses: clinical results and technical complications up to 4 years of function. Papaspyridakos P; Lal K Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 22413889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study. Tischler M; Patch C; Bidra AS J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 29559219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up. Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months. Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival of 2039 complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: A retrospective study. Bidra AS; Tischler M; Patch C J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):220-224. PubMed ID: 28689903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 20 Double Full-Arch Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Prostheses: Measurements and Recommendations for Optimal Design. Rojas Vizcaya F J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):501-508. PubMed ID: 27570943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. All-ceramic, bi-layered crowns supported by zirconia implants: Three-year results of a prospective multicenter study. Spies BC; Balmer M; Jung RE; Sailer I; Vach K; Kohal RJ J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():58-65. PubMed ID: 28939484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complications and Clinical Considerations of the Implant-Retained Zirconia Complete-Arch Prosthesis with Various Opposing Dentitions. Gonzalez J; Triplett RG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):864-869. PubMed ID: 28708920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hardware complications and failure of three-unit zirconia-based and porcelain-fused-metal implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a retrospective cohort study with up to 8 years. Shi JY; Zhang XM; Qiao SC; Qian SJ; Mo JJ; Lai HC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 May; 28(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 26990006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new, short, specific questionnaire (QoLIP-10) for evaluating the oral health-related quality of life of implant-retained overdenture and hybrid prosthesis wearers. Preciado A; Del Río J; Lynch CD; Castillo-Oyagüe R J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):753-63. PubMed ID: 23831418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]