146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29091020)
1. Do Clinical and Radiological Assessments Contribute to the Understanding of Biomaterials? Results From a Prospective Randomized Sinus Augmentation Split-Mouth Trial.
Lorenz J; Korzinskas T; Chia P; Maawi SA; Eichler K; Sader RA; Ghanaati S
J Oral Implantol; 2018 Feb; 44(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 29091020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sinus Floor Elevation and Augmentation Using Synthetic Nanocrystalline and Nanoporous Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute Materials: Preliminary Histologic Results.
Belouka SM; Strietzel FP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1281-1291. PubMed ID: 27861653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite-based material already contributes to implant stability after 3 months: a clinical and radiologic 3-year follow-up investigation.
Ghanaati S; Lorenz J; Obreja K; Choukroun J; Landes C; Sader RA
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 24044461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sinus augmentation using a mini-pig model: Effect of ceramic and allogeneic bone biomaterials.
Susin C; Fiorini T; Lee J; de Freitas RM; Chiu HC; Prasad HS; Buxton AN; Wikesjö UME
J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Oct; 44(10):1059-1066. PubMed ID: 28644556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone vs. a bovine-derived xenograft - a 5-year retrospective study.
Lutz R; Berger-Fink S; Stockmann P; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 25906198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs.
Jensen T; Schou S; Svendsen PA; Forman JL; Gundersen HJ; Terheyden H; Holmstrup P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):902-10. PubMed ID: 22044477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TRAP-Positive Multinucleated Giant Cells Are Foreign Body Giant Cells Rather Than Osteoclasts: Results From a Split-Mouth Study in Humans.
Lorenz J; Kubesch A; Korzinskas T; Barbeck M; Landes C; Sader RA; Kirkpatrick CJ; Ghanaati S
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):e257-66. PubMed ID: 25490579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two different absorbable membranes for the coverage of lateral osteotomy sites in maxillary sinus augmentation: a preliminary study.
Gassling V; Purcz N; Braesen JH; Will M; Gierloff M; Behrens E; Açil Y; Wiltfang J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 41(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 23218506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery with BioOss® mixed with a bone marrow concentrate or autogenous bone: test of principle on implant survival and clinical performance.
Rickert D; Vissink A; Slot WJ; Sauerbier S; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 43(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 24183511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical and histological case series study on calcium sulfate for maxillary sinus floor augmentation and delayed placement of dental implants.
Dasmah A; Hallman M; Sennerby L; Rasmusson L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 19843103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histological and radiological evaluation of sintered and non-sintered deproteinized bovine bone substitute materials in sinus augmentation procedures. A prospective, randomized-controlled, clinical multicenter study.
Fienitz T; Moses O; Klemm C; Happe A; Ferrari D; Kreppel M; Ormianer Z; Gal M; Rothamel D
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 27129584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss as a sole graft: a histologic, radiographic and preliminary clinical study].
Liu Y; Chen F; Feng Y; Xie C; Song YL; Li DH
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 48(9):513-7. PubMed ID: 24314275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone.
Lindgren C; Mordenfeld A; Hallman M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 20491816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological results after maxillary sinus augmentation with Straumann® BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss®, Puros®, and autologous bone. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Schmitt CM; Doering H; Schmidt T; Lutz R; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May; 24(5):576-85. PubMed ID: 22324456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric analysis of bone substitute material performance within the human sinus cavity of former head and neck cancer patients: A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Lorenz J; Eichler K; Barbeck M; Lerner H; Stübinger S; Seipel C; Vogl TJ; Kovács AF; Ghanaati S; Sader RA
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2016; 6(2):175-181. PubMed ID: 28299254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of autogenous concentrated bone marrow aspirate on bone regeneration after sinus floor augmentation with a bovine bone substitute--a split-mouth pilot study.
Wildburger A; Payer M; Jakse N; Strunk D; Etchard-Liechtenstein N; Sauerbier S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 23875876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone formation with a biphasic calcium phosphate combined with fibrin sealant in maxillary sinus floor elevation for delayed dental implant.
Wagner W; Wiltfang J; Pistner H; Yildirim M; Ploder B; Chapman M; Schiestl N; Hantak E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1112-7. PubMed ID: 22892064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative histological results of different biomaterials used in sinus augmentation procedures: a human study at 6 months.
Iezzi G; Degidi M; Piattelli A; Mangano C; Scarano A; Shibli JA; Perrotti V
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Dec; 23(12):1369-76. PubMed ID: 22092377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans.
Yildirim M; Spiekermann H; Handt S; Edelhoff D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11280359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]