These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2909118)

  • 1. Normal collecting ducts: visualization at urography.
    Ohlson L
    Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):33-7. PubMed ID: 2909118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opacification of collecting ducts at urography.
    Saxton HM
    Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):16-7. PubMed ID: 2909091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microradiography of the collecting ducts in the perfusion fixed rabbit kidney: suggestions for the anatomic basis for the radiographic appearance of cortical striations and intrarenal reflux.
    Gade R; Gade MF
    Invest Radiol; 1978; 13(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 689825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different doses of iohexol with amidotrizoate for excretory urography in cats.
    Agut A; Murciano J; Sanchez-Valverde MA; Laredo FG; Tovar MC
    Res Vet Sci; 1999 Aug; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 10425244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of low-osmolality contrast medium does not increase prevalence of medullary sponge kidney.
    Ginalski JM; Spiegel T; Jaeger P
    Radiology; 1992 Feb; 182(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 1732941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The crescent sign in childhood urography].
    Lange H; Knopp W; Jecht I
    Kinderarztl Prax; 1979 Apr; 47(4):178-82. PubMed ID: 480790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Examination by densitometer on visualization of non-ionic contrast medium (iohexol) in excretory urography. 2. Changes in visualization by DIP].
    Ikeuchi T; Hamashima T; Sakamoto M
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Feb; 36(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 2343807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Excretory urography with iohexol: evaluation in children.
    Magill HL; Clarke EA; Fitch SJ; Boulden TF; Ramirez R; Siegle RL; Somes GW
    Radiology; 1986 Dec; 161(3):625-30. PubMed ID: 3786708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study on nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents for drip infused urography].
    Sugaya K; Nishizawa O; Noto H; Suzuki T; Shimoda N; Miyagata S; Harada T; Tsuchida S
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Jul; 38(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 1524001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Urothelial striations revisited.
    Parker MD; Clark RL
    Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):89-91. PubMed ID: 8539412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of the natural progression of medullary sponge kidney and a novel grading system based on intravenous urography findings.
    Forster JA; Taylor J; Browning AJ; Biyani CS
    Urol Int; 2007; 78(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 17406139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.
    Winfield AC; Dray RJ; Kirchner FK; Muhletaler CA; Price RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):571-3. PubMed ID: 6349311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pneumocalyx following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.
    Daughtry JD; Rodan BA; Bean WJ
    Urology; 1986 Oct; 28(4):293-4. PubMed ID: 3765238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of iohexol and diatrizoate on pulmonary arterial pressure following pulmonary angiography. A clinical comparison in man.
    Tajima H; Kumazaki T; Tajima N; Ebata K
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(4):487-90. PubMed ID: 3408612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of urograms in infants: a comparison of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide and iohexol.
    Rawlinson J; Hyde I; Williams J
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):592-5. PubMed ID: 3408847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gadolinium-DPTA: a radiographic contrast agent.
    Janon EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jun; 152(6):1348. PubMed ID: 2718885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Water-soluble contrast media in obstructed in ischemic small intestine. A clinical and experimental study.
    Stordahl A
    J Oslo City Hosp; 1989; 39(1-2):3-22. PubMed ID: 2649649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.