156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29091269)
1. Automated model-based quantitative analysis of phantoms with spherical inserts in FDG PET scans.
Ulrich EJ; Sunderland JJ; Smith BJ; Mohiuddin I; Parkhurst J; Plichta KA; Buatti JM; Beichel RR
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):258-276. PubMed ID: 29091269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Dirichlet process mixture model for automatic (18)F-FDG PET image segmentation: Validation study on phantoms and on lung and esophageal lesions.
Giri MG; Cavedon C; Mazzarotto R; Ferdeghini M
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2491. PubMed ID: 27147360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.
Beichel RR; Smith BJ; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Huang Q; Kinahan PE; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Tan Y; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Buatti JM
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):479-496. PubMed ID: 28205306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel 3D-printed phantom insert for 4D PET/CT imaging and simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy.
Cerviño L; Soultan D; Cornell M; Yock A; Pettersson N; Song WY; Aguilera J; Advani S; Murphy J; Hoh C; James C; Paravati A; Coope R; Gill B; Moiseenko V
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5467-5474. PubMed ID: 28766726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An algorithm for automated ROI definition in water or epoxy-filled NEMA NU-2 image quality phantoms.
Pierce LA; Byrd DW; Elston BF; Karp JS; Sunderland JJ; Kinahan PE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):440–456. PubMed ID: 26894356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel approach for quantitative harmonization in PET.
Namías M; Bradshaw T; Menezes VO; Machado MAD; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(9):095019. PubMed ID: 29726406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of scanner harmonization on PET-based treatment response assessment in metastatic melanoma.
Weisman AJ; Bradshaw TJ; Namias M; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(22):225003. PubMed ID: 32906111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance Evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanner Based on NEMA NU 2-2018 with Additional Tests to Characterize PET Scanners with a Long Axial Field of View.
Spencer BA; Berg E; Schmall JP; Omidvari N; Leung EK; Abdelhafez YG; Tang S; Deng Z; Dong Y; Lv Y; Bao J; Liu W; Li H; Jones T; Badawi RD; Cherry SR
J Nucl Med; 2021 Jun; 62(6):861-870. PubMed ID: 33008932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of the quantitative PET prostate phantom (Q3P) for improved quality assurance of
Fedrigo R; Coope R; Rahmim A; Bénard F; Uribe CF
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38348927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring PET Spatial Resolution Using a Cylinder Phantom Positioned at an Oblique Angle.
Lodge MA; Leal JP; Rahmim A; Sunderland JJ; Frey EC
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1768-1775. PubMed ID: 29903932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of patient's habitus on image quality and quantitative metrics in 18F-FDG PET/CT images.
Zorz A; D'Alessio A; Guida F; Ramadan RM; Richetta E; Cuppari L; Pellerito R; Sacchetti GM; Brambilla M; Paiusco M; Stasi M; Matheoud R
Phys Med; 2023 May; 109():102584. PubMed ID: 37060633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.
Doot RK; Scheuermann JS; Christian PE; Karp JS; Kinahan PE
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6035-46. PubMed ID: 21158315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom.
Mansor S; Pfaehler E; Heijtel D; Lodge MA; Boellaard R; Yaqub M
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6413-6424. PubMed ID: 28994465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated measurement of uptake in cerebellum, liver, and aortic arch in full-body FDG PET/CT scans.
Bauer C; Sun S; Sun W; Otis J; Wallace A; Smith BJ; Sunderland JJ; Graham MM; Sonka M; Buatti JM; Beichel RR
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3112-23. PubMed ID: 22755696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Truncation artifact on PET/CT: impact on measurements of activity concentration and assessment of a correction algorithm.
Mawlawi O; Erasmus JJ; Pan T; Cody DD; Campbell R; Lonn AH; Kohlmyer S; Macapinlac HA; Podoloff DA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 May; 186(5):1458-67. PubMed ID: 16632745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total-body
Hu P; Zhang Y; Yu H; Chen S; Tan H; Qi C; Dong Y; Wang Y; Deng Z; Shi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2384-2394. PubMed ID: 33866409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
