These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29091944)
1. Rapid regrowth and detection of microbial contaminants in equine fecal microbiome samples. Beckers KF; Schulz CJ; Childers GW PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187044. PubMed ID: 29091944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of the fecal bacteria communities of forage-fed horses by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA V4 gene amplicons. Shepherd ML; Swecker WS; Jensen RV; Ponder MA FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2012 Jan; 326(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 22092776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses. Stewart HL; Pitta D; Indugu N; Vecchiarelli B; Engiles JB; Southwood LL Am J Vet Res; 2018 Aug; 79(8):811-819. PubMed ID: 30058849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of fecal bacterial viability and diversity in fresh and frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) product in horses. Long AE; Pitta D; Hennessy M; Indugu N; Vecchiarelli B; Luethy D; Aceto H; Hurcombe S BMC Vet Res; 2024 Jul; 20(1):306. PubMed ID: 38987780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a modified phenol/chloroform and commercial-kit methods for extracting DNA from horse fecal material. Janabi AHD; Kerkhof LJ; McGuinness LR; Biddle AS; McKeever KH J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():14-19. PubMed ID: 27460337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability, stability, and resilience of fecal microbiota in dairy cows fed whole crop corn silage. Tang MT; Han H; Yu Z; Tsuruta T; Nishino N Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Aug; 101(16):6355-6364. PubMed ID: 28601892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Overlapping Community Compositions of Gut and Fecal Microbiomes in Lab-Reared and Field-Collected German Cockroaches. Kakumanu ML; Maritz JM; Carlton JM; Schal C Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 29959246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intense Exercise and Aerobic Conditioning Associated with Chromium or L-Carnitine Supplementation Modified the Fecal Microbiota of Fillies. Almeida ML; Feringer WH; Carvalho JR; Rodrigues IM; Jordão LR; Fonseca MG; Carneiro de Rezende AS; de Queiroz Neto A; Weese JS; Costa MC; Lemos EG; Ferraz GC PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167108. PubMed ID: 27935992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study. Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic changes of the respiratory microbiota and its relationship to fecal and blood microbiota in healthy young cats. Vientós-Plotts AI; Ericsson AC; Rindt H; Grobman ME; Graham A; Bishop K; Cohn LA; Reinero CR PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173818. PubMed ID: 28278278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-depth snapshot of the equine subgingival microbiome. Gao W; Chan Y; You M; Lacap-Bugler DC; Leung WK; Watt RM Microb Pathog; 2016 May; 94():76-89. PubMed ID: 26550763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of dholes high-throughput Illumina sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Wu X; Zhang H; Chen J; Shang S; Wei Q; Yan J; Tu X Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Apr; 100(8):3577-86. PubMed ID: 26728019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toolbox Approaches Using Molecular Markers and 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Data Sets for Identification of Fecal Pollution in Surface Water. Ahmed W; Staley C; Sadowsky MJ; Gyawali P; Sidhu JP; Palmer A; Beale DJ; Toze S Appl Environ Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 81(20):7067-77. PubMed ID: 26231650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guided Protocol for Fecal Microbial Characterization by 16S rRNA-Amplicon Sequencing. Di Segni A; Braun T; BenShoshan M; Farage Barhom S; Glick Saar E; Cesarkas K; Squires JE; Keller N; Haberman Y J Vis Exp; 2018 Mar; (133):. PubMed ID: 29608151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 1-Day or 5-Day Fecal Samples, Which One is More Beneficial to be Used for DNA-Based Gut Microbiota Study. Su T; Liu R; Long Y; Quan S; Lai S; Wang L; Si J; Chen S Curr Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 75(3):288-295. PubMed ID: 29353421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dysbiosis of the fecal microbiota in feedlot cattle with hemorrhagic diarrhea. Zeineldin M; Aldridge B; Lowe J Microb Pathog; 2018 Feb; 115():123-130. PubMed ID: 29275129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences. Stanley D; Geier MS; Chen H; Hughes RJ; Moore RJ BMC Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 15():51. PubMed ID: 25887695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Capturing the diversity of the human gut microbiota through culture-enriched molecular profiling. Lau JT; Whelan FJ; Herath I; Lee CH; Collins SM; Bercik P; Surette MG Genome Med; 2016 Jul; 8(1):72. PubMed ID: 27363992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developmental Dynamic Analysis of the Excreted Microbiome of Chickens Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Lim S; Cho S; Caetano-Anolles K; Jeong SG; Oh MH; Park BY; Kim HJ; Cho S; Choi SH; Ryu S; Lee JH; Kim H; Ham JS J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015; 25(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 26138263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]