BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29092577)

  • 1. Modified error in constitutive equations (MECE) approach for ultrasound elastography.
    Ghosh S; Zou Z; Babaniyi O; Aquino W; Diaz MI; Bayat M; Fatemi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):2084. PubMed ID: 29092577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound elastography using a regularized modified error in constitutive equations (MECE) approach: a comprehensive phantom study.
    Ghavami S; Babaniyi O; Adabi S; Rosen D; Alizad A; Aquino W; Fatemi M
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(22):225026. PubMed ID: 33032271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-source and multi-directional shear wave generation with intersecting steered ultrasound push beams.
    Nabavizadeh A; Song P; Chen S; Greenleaf JF; Urban MW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Apr; 62(4):647-62. PubMed ID: 25881343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new method for shear wave speed estimation in shear wave elastography.
    Engel AJ; Bashford GR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Dec; 62(12):2106-14. PubMed ID: 26670851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytical Minimization-Based Regularized Subpixel Shear-Wave Tracking for Ultrasound Elastography.
    Horeh MD; Asif A; Rivaz H
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Feb; 66(2):285-296. PubMed ID: 30530321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force.
    Palmeri ML; Wang MH; Dahl JJ; Frinkley KD; Nightingale KR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 34(4):546-58. PubMed ID: 18222031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method for characterization of tissue elastic properties combining ultrasonic computed tomography with elastography.
    Glozman T; Azhari H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Mar; 29(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 20194935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of wall thickness and diameter on arterial shear wave elastography: a phantom and finite element study.
    Maksuti E; Bini F; Fiorentini S; Blasi G; Urban MW; Marinozzi F; Larsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2694-2718. PubMed ID: 28081009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonic tracking of shear waves using a particle filter.
    Ingle AN; Ma C; Varghese T
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6711-24. PubMed ID: 26520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear wave arrival time estimates correlate with local speckle pattern.
    Mcaleavey SA; Osapoetra LO; Langdon J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Dec; 62(12):2054-67. PubMed ID: 26670847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-quality model generation for finite element simulation of tissue deformation.
    Goksel O; Salcudean SE
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):248-56. PubMed ID: 20426119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of liver fibrosis with 2-D shear wave elastography in comparison to transient elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in patients with chronic liver disease.
    Gerber L; Kasper D; Fitting D; Knop V; Vermehren A; Sprinzl K; Hansmann ML; Herrmann E; Bojunga J; Albert J; Sarrazin C; Zeuzem S; Friedrich-Rust M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2350-9. PubMed ID: 26116161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
    Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel Method for Vessel Cross-Sectional Shear Wave Imaging.
    He Q; Li GY; Lee FF; Zhang Q; Cao Y; Luo J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1520-1532. PubMed ID: 28408062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Arterial Stiffness Estimation by Shear Wave Elastography: Validation in Phantoms with Mechanical Testing.
    Maksuti E; Widman E; Larsson D; Urban MW; Larsson M; Bjällmark A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):308-21. PubMed ID: 26454623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus.
    Pagé G; Bied M; Garteiser P; Van Beers B; Etaix N; Fraschini C; Bel-Brunon A; Gennisson JL
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37703895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of fractional wave equations for power law attenuation in ultrasound and elastography.
    Holm S; Näsholm SP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 24433745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of shear modulus of tissue using ultrasound radiation force acting on a spherical acoustic inhomogeneity.
    Karpiouk AB; Aglyamov SR; Ilinskii YA; Zabolotskaya EA; Emelianov SY
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Nov; 56(11):2380-7. PubMed ID: 19942525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shear wave velocity imaging using transient electrode perturbation: phantom and ex vivo validation.
    DeWall RJ; Varghese T; Madsen EL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):666-78. PubMed ID: 21075719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shear wave elasticity imaging based on acoustic radiation force and optical detection.
    Cheng Y; Li R; Li S; Dunsby C; Eckersley RJ; Elson DS; Tang MX
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1637-45. PubMed ID: 22749816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.