223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29092590)
1. Speech quality and stable gain trade-offs in adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids.
Lee CH; Kates JM; Rao BD; Garudadri H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL388. PubMed ID: 29092590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability-controlled hybrid adaptive feedback cancellation scheme for hearing aids.
Nordholm S; Schepker H; Tran LTT; Doclo S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):150. PubMed ID: 29390746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer EC; Rehmann J; Jha S; Allegro Baumann S; John A; Jones C
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):976-988. PubMed ID: 28851244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.
Parsa V; Scollie S; Glista D; Seelisch A
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 23539261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.
Kim G; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1581-96. PubMed ID: 21895096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.
Best V; Roverud E; Mason CR; Kidd G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL369. PubMed ID: 29092558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real-ear output measures of ear level fluency devices.
Stuart A; Butler AK; Jones SM; Jones TA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 23458475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Music and hearing aids.
Madsen SM; Moore BC
Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25361601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.
Sabin AT; Souza PE
Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):94-107. PubMed ID: 24028890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Music and hearing aids--an introduction.
Chasin M
Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 23258616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling the Intelligibility Benefit of Active Noise Cancelation in Hearing Devices That Improve Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
Sabin AT; McElhone D; Gauger D; Rabinowitz B
Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241260029. PubMed ID: 38831646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methods of improving speech intelligibility for listeners with hearing resolution deficit.
Kupryjanow A; Czyzewski A
Diagn Pathol; 2012 Sep; 7():129. PubMed ID: 23009662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
