These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29092590)

  • 1. Speech quality and stable gain trade-offs in adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids.
    Lee CH; Kates JM; Rao BD; Garudadri H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL388. PubMed ID: 29092590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stability-controlled hybrid adaptive feedback cancellation scheme for hearing aids.
    Nordholm S; Schepker H; Tran LTT; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):150. PubMed ID: 29390746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer EC; Rehmann J; Jha S; Allegro Baumann S; John A; Jones C
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):976-988. PubMed ID: 28851244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
    Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
    Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
    Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.
    Parsa V; Scollie S; Glista D; Seelisch A
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 23539261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.
    Kim G; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1581-96. PubMed ID: 21895096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefit of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Signal Enhancement for Speech Reception in Complex Listening Situations.
    Jansen T; Hartog L; Oetting D; Hohmann V; Kayser H
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241271407. PubMed ID: 39397631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.
    Best V; Roverud E; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL369. PubMed ID: 29092558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-ear output measures of ear level fluency devices.
    Stuart A; Butler AK; Jones SM; Jones TA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 23458475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Music and hearing aids.
    Madsen SM; Moore BC
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25361601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial development of a temporal-envelope-preserving nonlinear hearing aid prescription using a genetic algorithm.
    Sabin AT; Souza PE
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Jun; 17(2):94-107. PubMed ID: 24028890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Music and hearing aids--an introduction.
    Chasin M
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 23258616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling the Intelligibility Benefit of Active Noise Cancelation in Hearing Devices That Improve Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
    Sabin AT; McElhone D; Gauger D; Rabinowitz B
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241260029. PubMed ID: 38831646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.