BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29092595)

  • 21. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporal modulations in speech and music.
    Ding N; Patel AD; Chen L; Butler H; Luo C; Poeppel D
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2017 Oct; 81(Pt B):181-187. PubMed ID: 28212857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Processing speech signal using auditory-like filterbank provides least uncertainty about articulatory gestures.
    Ghosh PK; Goldstein LM; Narayanan SS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):4014-22. PubMed ID: 21682422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reading and spontaneous speaking fundamental frequency of young Arabic men for Arabic and English languages: a comparative study.
    Abu-Al-makarem A; Petrosino L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Oct; 105(2):572-80. PubMed ID: 18065081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Linguistic initiation signals increase auditory feedback error correction.
    Alsius A; Mitsuya T; Latif N; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):838. PubMed ID: 28863596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do rhythm measures reflect perceived rhythm?
    Barry W; Andreeva B; Koreman J
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(1-2):78-94. PubMed ID: 19390232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Language-specific realizations of syllable structure and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation.
    Mok PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1346-56. PubMed ID: 20815469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of language on the acoustic properties of phonetic features: a study of the feature [strident] in Ewe and English.
    Utman JA; Blumstein SE
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(4):221-38. PubMed ID: 7938204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The acoustic properties of bilingual infant-directed speech.
    Danielson DK; Seidl A; Onishi KH; Alamian G; Cristia A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):EL95-101. PubMed ID: 25234921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cross-Linguistic Differences in a Picture-Description Task Between Korean- and English-Speaking Individuals With Aphasia.
    Sung JE; DeDe G; Lee SE
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Dec; 25(4S):S813-S822. PubMed ID: 27997955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Connected Speech Characteristics of Bengali Speakers With Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence for Language-Specific Diagnostic Markers.
    Bose A; Dash NS; Ahmed S; Dutta M; Dutt A; Nandi R; Cheng Y; D Mello TM
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2021; 13():707628. PubMed ID: 34557084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech motor development: Integrating muscles, movements, and linguistic units.
    Smith A
    J Commun Disord; 2006; 39(5):331-49. PubMed ID: 16934286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sequences of Intonation Units form a ~ 1 Hz rhythm.
    Inbar M; Grossman E; Landau AN
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15846. PubMed ID: 32985572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rhythmic patterning in Malaysian and Singapore English.
    Tan RS; Low EL
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):196-214. PubMed ID: 25102606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between acoustic measures and speech naturalness ratings in Parkinson's disease: A within-speaker approach.
    Klopfenstein M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2015; 29(12):938-54. PubMed ID: 26403503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phonetic tone signals phonological quantity and word structure.
    Vainio M; Järvikivi J; Aalto D; Suni A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1313-21. PubMed ID: 20815466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How the demographic makeup of our community influences speech perception.
    Lev-Ari S; Peperkamp S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3076. PubMed ID: 27369129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A cross-linguistic investigation of locus equations as a phonetic descriptor for place of articulation.
    Sussman HM; Hoemeke KA; Ahmed FS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1256-68. PubMed ID: 8408965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Parametric quantitative acoustic analysis of conversation produced by speakers with dysarthria and healthy speakers.
    Rosen KM; Kent RD; Delaney AL; Duffy JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):395-411. PubMed ID: 16671852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.