190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29092612)
1. Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.
Deroche MLD; Limb CJ; Chatterjee M; Gracco VL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):1739. PubMed ID: 29092612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
Deroche ML; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.
Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Free RH; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL159-65. PubMed ID: 24606310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving masked speech.
Boebinger D; Evans S; Rosen S; Lima CF; Manly T; Scott SK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):378-87. PubMed ID: 25618067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gaps-in-noise detection and gender identification from noise-vocoded vowel segments: Comparing performance of active musicians to non-musicians.
Donai JJ; Jennings MB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):EL128. PubMed ID: 27250197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of pitch height in lexical and musical tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians.
Lee CY; Lekich A; Zhang Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1607-15. PubMed ID: 24606295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Musician advantage for speech-on-speech perception.
Başkent D; Gaudrain E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL51-6. PubMed ID: 27036287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
Yoo J; Bidelman GM
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Roles of the target and masker fundamental frequencies in voice segregation.
Deroche ML; Culling JF; Chatterjee M; Limb CJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1225. PubMed ID: 25190396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No Musician Advantage in the Perception of Degraded-Fundamental Frequency Speech in Noisy Environments.
Hsieh IH; Guo YJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Aug; 66(8):2643-2655. PubMed ID: 37499233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low- and high-frequency cortical brain oscillations reflect dissociable mechanisms of concurrent speech segregation in noise.
Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
Hear Res; 2018 Apr; 361():92-102. PubMed ID: 29398142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enduring musician advantage among former musicians in prosodic pitch perception.
Toh XR; Tan SH; Wong G; Lau F; Wong FCK
Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):2657. PubMed ID: 36788323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informational masking and the effects of differences in fundamental frequency and fundamental-frequency contour on phonetic integration in a formant ensemble.
Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():295-303. PubMed ID: 27815130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds.
Madsen SMK; Whiteford KL; Oxenham AJ
Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12624. PubMed ID: 28974705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
Deroche ML; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
