These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29092612)

  • 41. Musical training, individual differences and the cocktail party problem.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Kidd G; Patel AD
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11628. PubMed ID: 26112910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [The effect of musical practice on speech recognition in quiet and noisy situations].
    Soncini F; Costa MJ
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 16927621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.
    Sell G; Suied C; Elhilali M; Shamma S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):911-22. PubMed ID: 25698023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.
    Bidelman GM; Krishnan A
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1355():112-25. PubMed ID: 20691672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Pitch and Time Processing in Speech and Tones: The Effects of Musical Training and Attention.
    Sares AG; Foster NEV; Allen K; Hyde KL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):496-509. PubMed ID: 29466555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The encoding of vowels and temporal speech cues in the auditory cortex of professional musicians: an EEG study.
    Kühnis J; Elmer S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jul; 51(8):1608-18. PubMed ID: 23664833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The impact of musicianship on the cortical mechanisms related to separating speech from background noise.
    Zendel BR; Tremblay CD; Belleville S; Peretz I
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):1044-59. PubMed ID: 25390195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Speech-in-noise perception in musicians and non-musicians: A multi-level meta-analysis.
    Hennessy S; Mack WJ; Habibi A
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108442. PubMed ID: 35078132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Contribution of temporal fine structure information and fundamental frequency separation to intelligibility in a competing-speaker paradigm.
    Jackson HM; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2421-30. PubMed ID: 23556607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Musical experience is linked to enhanced dimension-selective attention to pitch and increased primary weighting during suprasegmental categorization.
    Symons AE; Tierney AT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Feb; 50(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 37289511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of reverberation on perceptual segregation of competing voices.
    Culling JF; Hodder KI; Toh CY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Nov; 114(5):2871-6. PubMed ID: 14650021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):446-54. PubMed ID: 12880055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers.
    Cooke M; Lu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2059-69. PubMed ID: 20968376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The role of visual speech cues in reducing energetic and informational masking.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):842-9. PubMed ID: 15759704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Attentional Modulation and Individual Differences in Explaining the Changing Role of Fundamental Frequency in Korean Laryngeal Stop Perception.
    Kong EJ; Lee H
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 28937301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Towards a Native OPERA Hypothesis: Musicianship and English Stress Perception.
    Choi W
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):697-712. PubMed ID: 34615397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.