These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29093150)

  • 1. Should Student Evaluation of Teaching Play a Significant Role in the Formal Assessment of Dental Faculty? Two Viewpoints: Viewpoint 1: Formal Faculty Assessment Should Include Student Evaluation of Teaching and Viewpoint 2: Student Evaluation of Teaching Should Not Be Part of Formal Faculty Assessment.
    Rowan S; Newness EJ; Tetradis S; Prasad JL; Ko CC; Sanchez A
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Nov; 81(11):1362-1372. PubMed ID: 29093150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should laptops be allowed in the classroom? Two viewpoints: viewpoint 1: laptops in classrooms facilitate curricular advancement and promote student learning and viewpoint 2: deconstructing and rethinking the use of laptops in the classroom.
    Spallek H; von Bergmann H
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(12):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25480272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Student Evaluations of Teaching: Dental and Dental Hygiene Students' and Faculty Members' Perspectives.
    Grillo AC; Murdoch-Kinch CA; Ramaswamy V; Inglehart MR
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Apr; 80(4):439-51. PubMed ID: 27037452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Faculty Development Workshops in Student-Centered Teaching Methodologies on Faculty Members' Teaching and Their Students' Perceptions.
    Tricio JA; Montt JE; Ormeño AP; Del Real AJ; Naranjo CA
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Jun; 81(6):675-684. PubMed ID: 28572413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of teaching performance in U.S. dental schools.
    Scruggs RR; George MC; Raney DL; Miller DL
    J Dent Educ; 1988 Feb; 52(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 3422252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental education and evidence-based educational best practices: bridging the great divide.
    Masella RS; Thompson TJ
    J Dent Educ; 2004 Dec; 68(12):1266-71. PubMed ID: 15576815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Triple jump examination evaluation of faculty examiners by dental student examinees.
    Navazesh M; Rich SK; Keim RG
    J Dent Educ; 2014 May; 78(5):714-22. PubMed ID: 24789831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should Attendance Be Required in Lecture Classrooms in Dental Education? Two Viewpoints: Viewpoint 1: Attendance in the Lecture Classroom Should Be Required and Viewpoint 2: Attendance Should Not Be Required in the Lecture Classroom.
    Cutler CW; Parise M; Seminario AL; Mendez MJ; Piskorowski W; Silva R
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Dec; 80(12):1474-1478. PubMed ID: 27934674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to evaluate clinical dental teachers (ECDT).
    McGrath C; Wai Kit Yeung R; Comfort MB; McMillan AS
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jan; 198(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15716893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Dental Students' Self-Directed, Faculty, and Software-Based Assessments of Dental Anatomy Wax-Ups: A Retrospective Study.
    Garrett PH; Faraone KL; Patzelt SB; Keaser ML
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1437-44. PubMed ID: 26632298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should Dental Schools Invest in Training Predoctoral Students for Academic Careers? Two Viewpoints: Viewpoint 1: Dental Schools Should Add Academic Careers Training to Their Predoctoral Curricula to Enhance Faculty Recruitment and Viewpoint 2: Addition of Academic Careers Training for All Predoctoral Students Would Be Inefficient and Ineffective.
    Fung B; Fatahzadeh M; Kirkwood KL; Hicks J; Timmons SR
    J Dent Educ; 2018 Apr; 82(4):379-387. PubMed ID: 29606655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and Implementation of a Clinical Dental Faculty Evaluation Instrument.
    Jeong YN; Natto ZS; Marks ME; Karimbux N
    J Dent Educ; 2020 Mar; 84(3):323-328. PubMed ID: 32176350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association amongst factors thought to be important by instructors in dental education and perceived effectiveness of these instructors by students.
    Chambers DW; Geissberger M; Leknius C
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2004 Nov; 8(4):147-51. PubMed ID: 15469440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and Implementation of an Electronic Clinical Formative Assessment: Dental Faculty and Student Perspectives.
    Kirkup ML; Adams BN; Meadows ML; Jackson R
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Jun; 80(6):652-61. PubMed ID: 27251346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. North American dental students' perspectives about their clinical education.
    Henzi D; Davis E; Jasinevicius R; Hendricson W
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Apr; 70(4):361-77. PubMed ID: 16595529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of an Analytical Grading Rubric for Self-Assessment: A Pilot Study for a Periodontal Oral Competency Examination in Predoctoral Dental Education.
    Satheesh KM; Brockmann LB; Liu Y; Gadbury-Amyot CC
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1429-36. PubMed ID: 26632297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The redundancy of student comments and numerical ratings in evaluations of teaching.
    Leonard DL; Marion R; Niebuhr BR
    J Allied Health; 1985 Feb; 14(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 3980285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. Dental students' and faculty members' attitudes about technology, instructional strategies, student diversity, and school duration: a comparative study.
    Abdelkarim A; Benghuzzi H; Hamadain E; Tucci M; Ford T; Sullivan D
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Apr; 78(4):614-21. PubMed ID: 24706692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
    Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should Pass/Fail Grading Be Used Instead of Traditional Letter Grades in Dental Education? Two Viewpoints: Viewpoint 1: Pass/Fail Grading Improves Learning Experiences for Students and Viewpoint 2: Traditional Letter Grading Provides Objective Evaluation for Dental Education.
    Jham BC; Cannella D; Adibi S; Austin K; Allareddy V; Petrie CS
    J Dent Educ; 2018 Dec; 82(12):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 30504462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.