These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29093282)

  • 41. The influence of bone loss on peri-implant bending strain under overdentures.
    Pham NQ; Gonda T; Takahashi T; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):900–906. PubMed ID: 30934034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant-supported overdentures under biting force: An in-vitro study.
    Zhang X; Liu W; Qing H; Pei X; Chen J; Wang J
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(9):709-717. PubMed ID: 29989109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Marginal bone resorption around immediate and delayed loaded implants supporting a locator-retained mandibular overdenture. A 1-year randomised controlled trial.
    Elsyad MA; Elsaih EA; Khairallah AS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Aug; 41(8):608-18. PubMed ID: 24814408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures.
    Oda K; Kanazawa M; Takeshita S; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27677217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures.
    Zou D; Wu Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wang S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 24179972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In vitro variation measurement of mandibular denture displacement resistance involving 1 to 3 implants.
    Yalikun K; Kanazawa M; Tanoue M; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):492-497. PubMed ID: 30391057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
    Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Electromyographic Connectivity of Masseter Muscle with Different Retentive Attachments for Implant Overdentures in Patients with Atrophied Mandibular Ridges: A Crossover Study.
    ElSyad MA; Ibrahim AE; Nawar NHH; Belal TM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1213–1222. PubMed ID: 30892293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems.
    Takeshita S; Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):928-34. PubMed ID: 22123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of Excessive Implant Angulation on Retention of Two Types of Overdenture Attachments during Cyclic Loading.
    Teimoori H; Shayegh SS; Zavaree MA; Hakimaneh SM; Khodadad F; Shidfar S; Baghani MT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Oct; 19(10):1221-1227. PubMed ID: 30498177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of Implant Height Differences on Different Attachment Types and Peri-Implant Bone in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: 3D Finite Element Study.
    Ozan O; Ramoglu S
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):e50-9. PubMed ID: 24471769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Long-term clinical and prosthetic outcomes of soft liner and clip attachments for bar/implant overdentures: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    ELsyad MA; Shaheen NH; Ashmawy TM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 44(6):472-480. PubMed ID: 28258636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of implant angulation and cyclic dislodging on the retentive force of two different overdenture attachments - an in vitro study.
    Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 26085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Lateral forces exerted through ball or bar attachments in relation to the inclination of mini-implant underneath overdentures: in vitro study.
    Takagaki K; Gonda T; Maeda Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1060-3. PubMed ID: 24730651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.