BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29094042)

  • 1. Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches.
    Tewes S; Peters I; Tiemeyer A; Peperhove M; Hartung D; Pertschy S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Hueper K
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():2176471. PubMed ID: 29094042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiparametric MRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Advantages of a Transperineal Approach.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Pennisi M
    Anticancer Res; 2017 Jun; 37(6):3291-3294. PubMed ID: 28551679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.
    Tewes S; Hueper K; Hartung D; Imkamp F; Herrmann TR; Weidemann J; Renckly S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Peters I
    World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1707-14. PubMed ID: 25774003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.
    Ber Y; Segal N; Tamir S; Benjaminov O; Yakimov M; Sela S; Halstauch D; Baniel J; Kedar D; Margel D
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 31953483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Combined with Standard Template Improves Prostate Cancer Detection.
    Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Wu CL; Dahl DM
    J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 34428921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound guided fusion biopsy of prostate for cancer detection-Comparing transrectal with transperineal approaches.
    Loy LM; Lim GH; Leow JJ; Lee CH; Tan TW; Tan CH
    Urol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):650-660. PubMed ID: 32505458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
    Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
    Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
    J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between target magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-gantry and cognitively directed transperineal or transrectal-guided prostate biopsies for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions.
    Yaxley AJ; Yaxley JW; Thangasamy IA; Ballard E; Pokorny MR
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120 Suppl 3():43-50. PubMed ID: 28749035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
    Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
    BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of extraprostatic extension by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted combined with systemic template prostate biopsy.
    Chuang HW; Wu S; Lin SX; Zhao T; Kim MM; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Dahl DM; Wu CL
    Diagn Pathol; 2023 Sep; 18(1):101. PubMed ID: 37697349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.
    Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
    BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Winoker JS; Wajswol E; Falagario U; Maritini A; Moshier E; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
    Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():278-286. PubMed ID: 32956688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Added Value of Multiparametric Ultrasonography in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography Fusion-guided Biopsy of the Prostate in Patients With Suspicion for Prostate Cancer.
    Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Durmus T; Slowinski T; Cash H; Fischer T
    Urology; 2015 Jul; 86(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 26142593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initial experience of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion transperineal biopsy: Biopsy techniques and results for 75 patients.
    Tae JH; Shim JS; Jin HJ; Yoon SG; No TI; Kim JY; Kang SH; Cheon J; Kang SG
    Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Nov; 59(6):363-370. PubMed ID: 30402568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.
    Castellucci R; Linares Quevedo AI; Sánchez Gómez FJ; Díez Rodríguez J; Cogorno L; Cogollos Acuña I; Salmerón Béliz I; Muñoz Fernández de Legaría M; Martínez Piñeiro L
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):589-595. PubMed ID: 29094851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer.
    Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D
    J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
    Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
    BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.