167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29094092)
1. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data to Assess the Sensitivity of Cervical Cytology for Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Castanon A; Landy R; Michalopoulos D; Bhudia R; Leaver H; Qiao YL; Zhao F; Sasieni P
J Glob Oncol; 2017 Oct; 3(5):524-538. PubMed ID: 29094092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.
Arbyn M; Roelens J; Simoens C; Buntinx F; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PP; Prendiville WJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008054. PubMed ID: 23543559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.
Koliopoulos G; Nyaga VN; Santesso N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Paraskevaidis E; Arbyn M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD008587. PubMed ID: 28796882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arbyn M; Bergeron C; Klinkhamer P; Martin-Hirsch P; Siebers AG; Bulten J
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 18165406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing as a primary screen for cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 17 population-based studies from China.
Zhao FH; Lin MJ; Chen F; Hu SY; Zhang R; Belinson JL; Sellors JW; Franceschi S; Qiao YL; Castle PE;
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1160-71. PubMed ID: 21075054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervicovaginal cytology in the detection of recurrence after cervical cancer treatment.
Rimel BJ; Ferda A; Erwin J; Dewdney SB; Seamon L; Gao F; DeSimone C; Cotney KK; Huh W; Massad LS
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 118(3):548-553. PubMed ID: 21860282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test.
Ronco G; Giorgi-Rossi P; Carozzi F; Confortini M; Dalla Palma P; Del Mistro A; Gillio-Tos A; Minucci D; Naldoni C; Rizzolo R; Schincaglia P; Volante R; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Cuzick J; Segnan N;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):492-501. PubMed ID: 18364502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.
Safaeian M; Wright TC; Stoler MH; Ranger-Moore J; Rehm S; Aslam S; Fang Q; Volkir P; Ridder R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 225(3):278.e1-278.e16. PubMed ID: 33852886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Punch biopsy guided by both colposcopy and HR-HPV status is more efficient for identification of immediate high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse among HPV-infected women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Ding Z; Li Y; Chen A; Song M; Zhang Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():32-36. PubMed ID: 27816739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The age-specific relationships of abnormal cytology and human papillomavirus DNA results to the risk of cervical precancer and cancer.
Castle PE; Fetterman B; Thomas Cox J; Shaber R; Poitras N; Lorey T; Kinney W
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 116(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 20567171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical value of p16
Song FB; Du H; Xiao AM; Wang C; Huang X; Yan PS; Liu ZH; Qu XF; Belinson JEROMEL; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):784-790. PubMed ID: 33228350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 or Worse by Cytology, Human Papillomavirus 16/18, and Colposcopy Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Silver MI; Andrews J; Cooper CK; Gage JC; Gold MA; Khan MJ; Massad LS; Parvu V; Perkins RB; Schiffman M; Smith KM; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 132(3):725-735. PubMed ID: 30095780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating cytology for the detection of invasive cervical cancer.
Landy R; Castanon A; Hamilton W; Lim AW; Dudding N; Hollingworth A; Sasieni PD
Cytopathology; 2016 Jun; 27(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 26126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
