185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29094386)
1. Characteristics and outcome of prostate cancer patients with overall biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 and highest Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 or > 3 + 4 = 7.
Verhoef EI; Kweldam CF; Kümmerlin IP; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Incrocci L; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJ
Histopathology; 2018 Apr; 72(5):760-765. PubMed ID: 29094386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy Gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma.
Kweldam CF; Kümmerlin IP; Nieboer D; Verhoef EI; Steyerberg EW; Incrocci L; Bangma CH; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJ
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Oct; 66():26-33. PubMed ID: 27522247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.
Kweldam CF; Kümmerlin IP; Nieboer D; Steyerberg EW; Bangma CH; Incrocci L; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJ
Mod Pathol; 2017 Aug; 30(8):1126-1132. PubMed ID: 28530220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in Japanese men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
Miyake H; Muramaki M; Furukawa J; Tanaka H; Inoue TA; Fujisawa M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1511-6. PubMed ID: 22658882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.
Berg KD; Røder MA; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 23889119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic significance of percentage Gleason grade 5 prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies from patients treated by radical prostatectomy.
Yaxley W; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Thunders MC; Kenwright DN; Egevad L; Samaratunga H
Pathology; 2022 Oct; 54(6):694-699. PubMed ID: 35613972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volume of Gleason pattern 4 stratifies risk of metastasis and death in patients with Gleason score 3+5=8/5+3=8 positive prostate core biopsies.
Acosta AM; Taplin ME; Mata DA; D'Amico AV; Hirsch MS
Hum Pathol; 2020 May; 99():62-74. PubMed ID: 32171650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome of Gleason 3 + 5 = 8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4 + 4 = 8.
Harding-Jackson N; Kryvenko ON; Whittington EE; Eastwood DC; Tjionas GA; Jorda M; Iczkowski KA
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1076-81. PubMed ID: 27265220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.
Pierorazio PM; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 23464824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.
Fossati N; Karnes RJ; Cozzarini C; Fiorino C; Gandaglia G; Joniau S; Boorjian SA; Goldner G; Hinkelbein W; Haustermans K; Tombal B; Shariat S; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):728-733. PubMed ID: 26497924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
Sauter G; Steurer S; Clauditz TS; Krech T; Wittmer C; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Janssen T; Hakimi N; Simon R; von Petersdorff-Campen M; Jacobsen F; von Loga K; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Haese A; Heinzer H; Beyer B; Graefen M; Michl U; Salomon G; Steuber T; Budäus LH; Hekeler E; Malsy-Mink J; Kutzera S; Fraune C; Göbel C; Huland H; Schlomm T
Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 26542947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30577397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
