BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29094851)

  • 1. Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.
    Castellucci R; Linares Quevedo AI; Sánchez Gómez FJ; Díez Rodríguez J; Cogorno L; Cogollos Acuña I; Salmerón Béliz I; Muñoz Fernández de Legaría M; Martínez Piñeiro L
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):589-595. PubMed ID: 29094851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
    Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
    van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
    Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
    BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
    Urol Int; 2017; 99(4):384-391. PubMed ID: 28651247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
    Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate: Quality of image fusion in a clinical setting.
    Schlenker B; Apfelbeck M; Buchner A; Stief C; Clevert DA
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(4):433-440. PubMed ID: 30347605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted vs. conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: single-institution, matched cohort comparison.
    Kim EH; Vemana G; Johnson MH; Vetter JM; Rensing AJ; Strother MC; Fowler KJ; Andriole GL
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25655682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between "In-bore" MRI guided prostate biopsy and standard ultrasound guided biopsy in the patient with suspicious prostate cancer: Preliminary results.
    D'Agostino D; Mineo Bianchi F; Romagnoli D; Corsi P; Giampaoli M; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Artibani W; Porreca A
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Jul; 91(2):. PubMed ID: 31266272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between target magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-gantry and cognitively directed transperineal or transrectal-guided prostate biopsies for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions.
    Yaxley AJ; Yaxley JW; Thangasamy IA; Ballard E; Pokorny MR
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120 Suppl 3():43-50. PubMed ID: 28749035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patients.
    Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Laqua N; Klingebiel M; Martin O; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():1-6. PubMed ID: 30927932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
    Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
    Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
    Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
    Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.
    Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
    BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.
    Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.