These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29094988)

  • 1. Cue interaction between buildings and street configurations during reorientation in familiar and unfamiliar outdoor environments.
    Wang L; Mou W; Dixon P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):631-644. PubMed ID: 29094988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing global spatial representations through across-boundary navigation.
    Lei X; Mou W; Zhang L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 31021116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of room size on geometry and features cue preference during reorientation: Modulating encoding strength or cue weighting.
    Wang L; Mou W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):225-238. PubMed ID: 31390927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference frames in spatial updating when body-based cues are absent.
    He Q; McNamara TP; Kelly JW
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 28755051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Angles no longer weigh in: The effect of geometric cue directness on reorientation.
    Huang Z; Hu Q; Shao Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28114779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective resetting position and heading estimations while driving in a large-scale immersive virtual environment.
    Zhang L; Mou W
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 237(2):335-350. PubMed ID: 30406817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiar environments enhance object and spatial memory in both younger and older adults.
    Merriman NA; Ondřej J; Roudaia E; O'Sullivan C; Newell FN
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1555-74. PubMed ID: 26821318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM; Brown MF
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19777275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orientation in Virtual Reality Does Not Fully Measure Up to the Real-World.
    Kimura K; Reichert JF; Olson A; Pouya OR; Wang X; Moussavi Z; Kelly DM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):18109. PubMed ID: 29273759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning.
    Sturz BR; Brown MF; Kelly DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 19293099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating position and heading estimations: rotated visual orientation cues perceived after walking reset headings but not positions.
    Mou W; Zhang L
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 25215931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental representations of recently learned nested environments.
    Wang Y; Yu X; Dou Y; McNamara TP; Li J
    Psychol Res; 2021 Nov; 85(8):2922-2934. PubMed ID: 33211160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of local visual cues for spatial orientation in terrestrial toads (Rhinella arenarum): The role of distance to a goal.
    Daneri MF; Casanave EB; Muzio RN
    J Comp Psychol; 2015 Aug; 129(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 26147701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A slippery directional slope: Individual differences in using slope as a directional cue.
    Weisberg SM; Newcombe NS
    Mem Cognit; 2014 May; 42(4):648-61. PubMed ID: 24338529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Look up: Human adults use vertical height cues in reorientation.
    Du Y; Spetch ML; Mou W
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1277-1287. PubMed ID: 27315804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks.
    Du Y; McMillan N; Madan CR; Spetch ML; Mou W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1857-1871. PubMed ID: 28504533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of geometric properties of landmark arrays for reorientation relative to remote cities and local objects.
    Mou W; Nankoo JF; Zhou R; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):476-91. PubMed ID: 24245534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Piloting and path integration within and across boundaries.
    Mou W; Wang L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):220-34. PubMed ID: 24933698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constraints on priming in spatial memory: naturally learned versus experimentally learned environments.
    McNamara TP; Altarriba J; Bendele M; Johnson SC; Clayton KN
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):444-53. PubMed ID: 2761402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environment size and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 23370045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.